IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds

<jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com> Tue, 19 August 2008 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <pce-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: pce-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-pce-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243743A67FA; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pce@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078793A6A37 for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:05:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z2Pr9Qfy71HN for <pce@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.15]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEE23A68C6 for <pce@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.193.117.152]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:05:10 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:05:09 +0200
Message-ID: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE0A464946@ftrdmel1>
In-Reply-To: <005701c90178$515e7d20$f41b7760$@net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
Thread-Index: Acj7pyptLCPuB7cqRUqAdIyb+FG8wwF0K0MgABJmiQA=
References: <200808111140.m7BBe1Aa025438@mta7.iomartmail.com> <005701c90178$515e7d20$f41b7760$@net>
From: jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com
To: pce@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Aug 2008 06:05:10.0155 (UTC) FILETIME=[895B55B0:01C901C1]
Subject: Re: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
X-BeenThere: pce@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Path Computation Element <pce.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/pce>
List-Post: <mailto:pce@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce>, <mailto:pce-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: pce-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: pce-bounces@ietf.org

 
Hi All,

I support these three docs as WG doc.

Regards,

JL

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:pce-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: 11 August 2008 12:40
> To: pce@ietf.org
> Subject: [Pce] Poll on further WG I-Ds
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following up some actions from Dublin...
> 
> Can you please express an opinion on whether the following 
> thress I-Ds are ready to be /should be adopted as PCE working 
> group I-Ds.
> 
> draft-zhao-pcep-p2mp-extension
> draft-otani-pce-gmpls-aps-req
> draft-nishioka-pce-svec-list
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pce mailing list
> Pce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce
> 
_______________________________________________
Pce mailing list
Pce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pce

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email