Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG

Dacheng Zhang <zhang_dacheng@hotmail.com> Mon, 21 July 2014 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <zhang_dacheng@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7C21B2AC4 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 18:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.448
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BVB3lRc-bynG for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 18:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU004-OMC2S33.hotmail.com (blu004-omc2s33.hotmail.com [65.55.111.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D86E31B2ABE for <pcp@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 18:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU436-SMTP160 ([65.55.111.72]) by BLU004-OMC2S33.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22712); Sun, 20 Jul 2014 18:54:09 -0700
X-TMN: [pKL1qQawDQtwOK8Ki8lTQ3msY4MUFU2L]
X-Originating-Email: [zhang_dacheng@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP160D767D9F6D8DA38BFCCC388F00@phx.gbl>
Received: from dhcp-9316.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.147.22]) by BLU436-SMTP160.smtp.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(8.0.9200.16384); Sun, 20 Jul 2014 18:54:07 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
From: Dacheng Zhang <zhang_dacheng@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A282F5EA7@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 09:54:08 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A282F5EA7@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
To: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2014 01:54:07.0713 (UTC) FILETIME=[A8889510:01CFA486]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/3wb_N9blRDeMzq7eLk3lVysvTq4
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 01:54:13 -0000

Thanks. I will definitly make an update by the end of this month. 


在 2014-7-21,上午1:36, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) 写道:

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ted Lemon [mailto:ted.lemon@nominum.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 5:24 PM
>> To: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
>> Cc: Dan Wing (dwing); Margaret Wasserman; pcp@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG
>> 
>> On Jul 20, 2014, at 2:48 AM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) <tireddy@cisco.com>
>> wrote:
>>> In addition to PCP Authentication other pending WG documents should also be
>> taken to completion.  I see various interesting individual drafts like draft-
>> boucadair-pcp-sfc-classifier-control-00, draft-chen-pcp-authentication-sim-00
>> etc. it seems too early to close the WG.
>> 
>> The trick with taking work to completion is that the work has to be worked on; I
>> think what the chairs were getting at is that they feel there's no energy to do the
>> work.   If that's not the case, the way to show us that is to do the work, not to
>> say that the work needs to be done. :)
> 
> Agreed. I will review PCP Proxy and PCP Auth drafts early next month and post my comments.
> 
> -Tiru
> 
>> 
>> That said, the two drafts you mentioned are not pcp working group documents.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pcp mailing list
> pcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp
>