IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Sun, 20 July 2014 11:54 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F84C1B2BBD for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 04:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tOQ8WQAm08qS for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 04:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E88C01B2BBE for <pcp@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 04:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CFB1B8724 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 04:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BCB190060; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 04:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.10] (99.232.25.196) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 04:54:27 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A282F5C32@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 07:54:16 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <11D98142-2566-4B9B-BD34-877E0A89F6FD@nominum.com>
References: <CFECB216.D03B%repenno@cisco.com> <C388038D-1DA9-4934-979E-E8054FD82D11@gmail.com> <6CCBA472-0B08-45E5-A245-536E3CA37B50@cisco.com> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A282F5C32@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
To: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [99.232.25.196]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/DwXk5DQyFeqIdzqUgmPcHv8GVSE
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 11:54:30 -0000

On Jul 20, 2014, at 2:48 AM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) <tireddy@cisco.com> wrote:
> In addition to PCP Authentication other pending WG documents should also be taken to completion.  I see various interesting individual drafts like draft-boucadair-pcp-sfc-classifier-control-00, draft-chen-pcp-authentication-sim-00 etc. it seems too early to close the WG.

The trick with taking work to completion is that the work has to be worked on; I think what the chairs were getting at is that they feel there's no energy to do the work.   If that's not the case, the way to show us that is to do the work, not to say that the work needs to be done. :)

That said, the two drafts you mentioned are not pcp working group documents.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email