[pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Thu, 17 July 2014 05:50 UTC

Return-Path: <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645741A0658 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BuSNQ827QZ4N for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB481A04B8 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jul 2014 22:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=980; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1405576201; x=1406785801; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=ET4Zg97hOJB/pngS8Y3zLtVrMpVeiWPhZRKWaXqY2rU=; b=I9vnYmBO7l6k4hkHLCxJXYDgRYsDapleWy/H/y87Uo9ynYCdJ6GtOKes 12eKnF+D0LZUGuyfgeVg/TIhdmKm9LtH8qSpd2DvWWnC84Ex0Y9pHcvjU X7LXnA0BH+uefUG4c6BMMtlm3Ra2KLYSSLokGyRo9l++zvuvTB/qaLYcX M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiEFAJ1jx1OtJV2Q/2dsb2JhbABZgw6BLcwIFnaECjo0HQE+QicEiFWjXaZdF5QVBZsdlCyDRIIx
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,676,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="340421875"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Jul 2014 05:50:00 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6H5o0GI030508 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 05:50:00 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.176]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:50:00 -0500
From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Discussion about Closing PCP WG
Thread-Index: AQHPoYLyCP/Gj5Y9hkitXO7sLwNpIw==
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 05:50:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CFECB216.D03B%repenno@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.21.126.122]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B23B6373E23AF9428367726B96BFBFBB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/40UXQ7eNKH9lnFwucDooSxmmZYg
Subject: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 05:50:05 -0000

The chairs and AD have been discussing the lack of activity on the mailing
list compounded with the low number of agenda requests and lack of any
agenda requests for WG documents.

Therefore we propose that after Server Selection and Anycast drafts are
done it would be a good point to close the WG. This has been a very
successful WG, we delivered what was in the original charter, adapted
quickly to incorporate new documents and delivered those.


Furthermore we would propose to hold a webex interim meeting in lieu of
the f2f meeting at the IETF. The WebEx interim meeting will be scheduled
to occur shortly after WGLC completes on the Server Selection draft, and
we plan to start the WGLC shortly.

The two agenda requests we received for discussion of new individual
drafts would be deferred to the interim meeting.

If you feel that closing the WG is premature, we need to see real progress
on other WG documents.


Thanks,

Reinaldo, Dave & Ted.