IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Sun, 20 July 2014 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F389E1B28E8 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 10:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QcsqETYa3x62 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 10:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8F021B28E1 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 10:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1173; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1405877775; x=1407087375; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+DTZsus8vEkA+toR5Ohw2IwBNLAfI+YM8IY2M/XMA3w=; b=RZh8wqQuyyvqlZ3eWtO35EmuQ11975lMxjiV5ae+3K3pjEHh8ZukDbJH MCeay4bVcqZmU9rIWiwyxdaBPicRuWCp3Q/NOSC/K53iYnStr/b9Ae0p3 hAyWa70IkeGw0AtxxHxPGkf0ggRr4HzaCJGJFZxrr/yUMRZGEK0byzbfb U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUFAJX9y1OtJA2D/2dsb2JhbABZgw6BLcxgAYEGFnaEAwEBAQMBOj8MBgEIEQQBAQEKFAk5FAkJAQQOBQiIMgjBERePGjENgyiBGAEEr1SDRGyBRQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,696,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="341463967"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2014 17:36:15 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6KHaF6a003034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sun, 20 Jul 2014 17:36:15 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.102]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 20 Jul 2014 12:36:14 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG
Thread-Index: Ac+kQRReHbvhTFfTRAKbhXM6ezo21g==
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 17:36:14 +0000
Message-ID: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A282F5EA7@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.48.121]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pcp/h0w9ogzWh1Arw7-L6vYHV3RZIHw
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 17:36:17 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Lemon [mailto:ted.lemon@nominum.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2014 5:24 PM
> To: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
> Cc: Dan Wing (dwing); Margaret Wasserman; pcp@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [pcp] Discussion about Closing PCP WG
> 
> On Jul 20, 2014, at 2:48 AM, Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) <tireddy@cisco.com>
> wrote:
> > In addition to PCP Authentication other pending WG documents should also be
> taken to completion.  I see various interesting individual drafts like draft-
> boucadair-pcp-sfc-classifier-control-00, draft-chen-pcp-authentication-sim-00
> etc. it seems too early to close the WG.
> 
> The trick with taking work to completion is that the work has to be worked on; I
> think what the chairs were getting at is that they feel there's no energy to do the
> work.   If that's not the case, the way to show us that is to do the work, not to
> say that the work needs to be done. :)

Agreed. I will review PCP Proxy and PCP Auth drafts early next month and post my comments.

-Tiru

> 
> That said, the two drafts you mentioned are not pcp working group documents.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email