IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 13 September 2012 18:03 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F9921F8504 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6hXKn3DHku9 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id AB63A21F84F6 for <pcp@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2012 18:03:19 -0000
Received: from a88-115-216-191.elisa-laajakaista.fi (EHLO [192.168.100.111]) [88.115.216.191] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 13 Sep 2012 20:03:19 +0200
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19NqKtFMlpN1DWIayrzLP21TJ8gClOkF/aFTQ90R4 WzmMcc3PIrZfVH
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <00e001cd91ce$c88ee1b0$59aca510$@com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 21:03:17 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <276FC888-007C-4F76-BB36-F919F2904431@gmx.net>
References: <20120913145755.6952gmx1@mx075.gmx.net> <1B150C40-51A4-4BD9-8915-2F9BC54B5BB9@gmx.net> <00e001cd91ce$c88ee1b0$59aca510$@com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: pcp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pcp] PANA implementatinos to consider
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 18:03:21 -0000

Hey Dan, 

On Sep 13, 2012, at 7:42 PM, Dan Wing wrote:

> However, I hope
> the IETF continues to welcome technical input, even if the person has
> no "skin in the game" or cannot publicly explain their funding source.

Definitely. I would love to see more persons involved who are purely driven by their desire to make the Internet work better. 

(I fear we get a bit off topic but I had to respond to avoid creating a wrong impression.)

Ciao
Hannes

PS: Just in case that this statement above gets misinterpreted; I am not saying that those who deploy technology are not welcome either...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email