IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pcp] CONSENSUS CALL on PCP security

"Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <tireddy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A4F21F9A94 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lmhnc5qMa0Vv for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F6221F991E for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1277; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1373994669; x=1375204269; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=m899C1HBGYZ1AQcoH+CLMrhc5lDMabfNNsuQve5dDIg=; b=Coff+PSbb9cqzCAaJJywwAM+xrq5p4LMNrEieb6PQ7MZN+MFGsiynPb9 kiooAAhu6MkeCdeKUdlHSWJhqv8ADmV2U4hm9K6czhDmMiC0MwFszLTu5 9p89BBXiAewOtOhBF8hFIovNwZCI6mAZKX6GIbdzHkS3WyFaaCzGpYu4J U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkFAEF+5VGtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABagwY0T8FugRAWdIIjAQEBAwE6RAcEAgEIDgMEAQELFAkHMhQJCAIEARIIiAIGDLV5jy44BoMGbQOZBZAkgxKCKA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,678,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="235609385"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Jul 2013 17:11:07 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6GHB73U031363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:11:07 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([169.254.15.56]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 12:11:07 -0500
From: "Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)" <tireddy@cisco.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] CONSENSUS CALL on PCP security
Thread-Index: AQHOgYO2/UME/BL9NUa9YVGvlLydx5lmzBxwgAEN8wD//7GFAA==
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:11:06 +0000
Message-ID: <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A14B9B329@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com>
References: <c91bb8469abe4b079e46454e022546e6@BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> <913383AAA69FF945B8F946018B75898A14B9AE60@xmb-rcd-x10.cisco.com> <a9f43a37e6fb4a11a05a66fb75182604@BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <a9f43a37e6fb4a11a05a66fb75182604@BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.65.69.156]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [pcp] CONSENSUS CALL on PCP security
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 17:11:15 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Thaler [mailto:dthaler@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 10:21 PM
> To: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy); pcp@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [pcp] CONSENSUS CALL on PCP security
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy) [mailto:tireddy@cisco.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 10:51 PM
> > To: Dave Thaler; pcp@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [pcp] CONSENSUS CALL on PCP security
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > In the poll when you refer to PANA, please clarify the draft you are
> referring
> > to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ohba-pcp-pana-04 or
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ohba-pcp-pana-encap-01 ?
> >
> > --Tiru.
> 
> The question is intentionally agnostic as this is about a general approach,
> not which specific implementation.  

Thanks that clarifies my doubt.

--Tiru.

> If it helps, you can interpret the
> answer as "which of the two you think is better".
> 
> If the consensus is PANA rather than direct EAP-in-PCP, then we could
> ask as a follow-up question which of the two we should go with. If
> you'd like to include your answer to that now though, feel free to
> include that in your response to the call.
> 
> -Dave
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email