Re: [pcp] CONSENSUS CALL on PCP security

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Tue, 23 July 2013 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1AA11E8386 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:11:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1OM2YPkxHC10 for <pcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC7711E836F for <pcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:11:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml203-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AVI87752; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:11:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) by lhreml203-edg.huawei.com (172.18.7.221) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:11:10 +0100
Received: from DFWEML408-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.134) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.7; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:11:21 +0100
Received: from DFWEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.217]) by dfweml408-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.134]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.007; Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:11:16 -0700
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
To: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
Thread-Topic: [pcp] CONSENSUS CALL on PCP security
Thread-Index: AQHOh+kr076e4buh5E6YRUgHIK1O9g==
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:11:16 +0000
Message-ID: <5D41E9D8-1474-416C-B13A-3C7E7E879FE3@huawei.com>
References: <c91bb8469abe4b079e46454e022546e6@BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <c91bb8469abe4b079e46454e022546e6@BY2PR03MB269.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Cc: "pcp@ietf.org" <pcp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [pcp] CONSENSUS CALL on PCP security
X-BeenThere: pcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PCP wg discussion list <pcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pcp>
List-Post: <mailto:pcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pcp>, <mailto:pcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 21:11:43 -0000

Dear all,

2) Could you *live with* PANA? If not, state reason you would object.

    YES


Thank you,
Tina