Re: [pkix] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

"Piyush Jain" <piyush@ditenity.com> Fri, 29 March 2013 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <piyush@ditenity.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B405021F95DF for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.854
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.854 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.745, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JxiDuppwswnn for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gh0-f181.google.com (mail-gh0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8353421F95E1 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-gh0-f181.google.com with SMTP id 3so77788ghz.26 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-mailer:thread-index:content-language:x-gm-message-state; bh=O8aVT+jGyoO8hV9o0JyKr5lYJzFt2VizUjM8F53BOF4=; b=iDpL8EwGV4scebHWhdHQaR9dI53OUUjq5UdiRvxBIhut1HwmNOPddpYgQmbojUBBCi ik7aKw2MiKaG8rO+FIODeJyt+yft52uKaIpnuwu26By9tS2Ohw+WW3ddeLZTG3Z6RJjL ykETpoSaRMDy7Aghe4hAmJFTUyydq5tNoVqr620DbtoEhz6FTm6B9Hg8j1akVwyNXttM 5RGLABi7H0J0v1szZ9u5RJ9R+IIM7NWH1thw5IdZsVVrXTP4enSWXs8J7MCZwvO4aCPg auAIgWP2KWrF0RpqwP64smUPX0I5Ocn4Me1tF5Fc1Of8jEDeOg47jAK8XGBUB+w0IheX W4+w==
X-Received: by 10.236.112.232 with SMTP id y68mr1399006yhg.15.1364591204067; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hp13 (75-25-128-241.lightspeed.sjcpca.sbcglobal.net. [75.25.128.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x33sm3558480yhn.18.2013.03.29.14.06.42 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:06:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Piyush Jain <piyush@ditenity.com>
To: 'Stefan Santesson' <stefan@aaa-sec.com>, "'Black, David'" <david.black@emc.com>, sts@aaa-sec.com, mmyers@fastq.com, ambarish@gmail.com, slava.galperin@gmail.com, cadams@eecs.uottawa.ca, gen-art@ietf.org
References: <012f01ce2ca0$9eaf4840$dc0dd8c0$@ditenity.com> <CD7BB05A.5F135%stefan@aaa-sec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD7BB05A.5F135%stefan@aaa-sec.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 14:06:38 -0700
Message-ID: <01bc01ce2cc1$4f80e280$ee82a780$@ditenity.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
thread-index: AQKoO57n93xm6dsdTwwJv/h02J257JcJCl3Q
Content-Language: en-us
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmoIrRHhlKP2LBtJl1RhONK0zeb4vjHYqmj7VwxkkBcuInmx+M7o4sBEwI4Q6Cl3Hf+xHfz
Cc: pkix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pkix] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:06:48 -0000

Not sure if I understand.
Are you saying legacy servers won't work with 2560bis clients?

> On 3/29/13 6:12 PM, "Piyush Jain" <piyush@ditenity.com> wrote:
> 
> >It is your statement about backward compatibility to justify it that is
> >incorrect.
> >Backward compatibility "with deployments of RFC2560" is not affected in
> >either case. Legacy clients will continue to work whether you make it
> >required or optional.
> 
> Legacy servers won't
> 
> /Stefan
>