IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [pkix] Straw-poll on OCSP responses for non-revoked certificates.

Erwann Abalea <eabalea@gmail.com> Wed, 31 October 2012 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <eabalea@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: pkix@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C006421F858E for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TAX8e5w4ObSE for <pkix@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCAC21F8567 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id k13so1322488lbo.31 for <pkix@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/z1w1owVHImUR5J7x7gXLWsoO3/1tuT9loDuJNHv6h4=; b=Oy77Adwm4UwSvuG7S5u/MDexFIS1dIBeR7kzkMzIrTmHIRpybsQdg5KGepYhBvfkmA UnhO3dCbM0+SK4BBVXnIwa3oe+6cSAHpP9siHevmoypfrh/8AXv8L2qgFw+72BvSgTKd tamtJp11MqUItUdVWCHIcmZYA846rprwZxVSFvenn86R8tJpGkNGFrLO0a0hgwNXRL8/ 0cCb+yRDERY24v54DFAS1jssZe1cIntXYBzFpOBchRX9SW9G1gVEol/XMSkU9+Z7U3LR ihQbthqhicLdFC5sJJoXlDwqRXgvLlX84rX+oKfhLXNsdjMxhQVTmJGIIg+0+ohmmOrp G4Bg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.105.236 with SMTP id gp12mr34458067lab.35.1351701026891; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.25.74 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <00b701cdb77d$61d29c80$2577d580$@digicert.com>
References: <CCB55CA3.52588%stefan@aaa-sec.com> <50910F9E.6000703@bull.net> <4C120EAB-B95B-4DEE-8DE7-9CDC45089C34@globalsign.com> <00b701cdb77d$61d29c80$2577d580$@digicert.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:30:26 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+i=0E6yVQT3P0Dbqizgvv+Rt-zCbx_FUjAAinW=MNF5nvTmQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Erwann Abalea <eabalea@gmail.com>
To: ben@digicert.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: pkix@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [pkix] Straw-poll on OCSP responses for non-revoked certificates.
X-BeenThere: pkix@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: PKIX Working Group <pkix.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix>
List-Post: <mailto:pkix@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix>, <mailto:pkix-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:30:33 -0000

#3 is "neither 1 or 2 (motivate)". It can be fulfilled by anything else.

2012/10/31 Ben Wilson <ben@digicert.com>:
> I don’t think the original ballot changed.  #1 was to allow revoked.  #3 was
> do nothing.  So, a vote that they favor “3 – unknown” is out of scope, but
> hopefully everyone understands that this is the nature of a straw poll?

-- 
Erwann.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email