Re: [precis] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-08: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 05 July 2017 05:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: precis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F365F129ADE; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 22:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.88
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.88 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pOaJFQItqIn0; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 22:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92F8C127076; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 22:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.63] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v655UBbp045243 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 00:30:12 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.63]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <cc99ec3a-7a5c-8c13-d39f-ee8493761669@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 00:30:12 -0500
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-precis-7564bis@ietf.org, precis@ietf.org, precis-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <62C8417C-4640-4518-AB31-C6525125E5FF@nostrum.com>
References: <149911881124.22832.7633748744729330805.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7A34BC2E-57EE-43A9-8A44-AC976BE0BBEA@stpeter.im> <C132E9AB-10A3-4D24-AD87-DA844DA6EDFF@nostrum.com> <51B82F94-462A-493D-ADB4-06B4198DC37C@stpeter.im> <cc99ec3a-7a5c-8c13-d39f-ee8493761669@stpeter.im>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/precis/WGtti6K2QfSHr57jx0PsJNHf5KE>
Subject: Re: [precis] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-precis-7564bis-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: precis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Preparation and Comparison of Internationalized Strings <precis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/precis/>
List-Post: <mailto:precis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/precis>, <mailto:precis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 05:30:15 -0000

> On Jul 4, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> wrote:
> 
> I propose that we leave Section 13.5 as it is and add the following
> paragraph to the end of Section 11.1:
> 
>   Note: IANA is requested to not make further updates to this registry
>   until the issues described in [IAB-Statement] and Section 13.5 have
>   been settled.

How will IANA know when those issues are settled? Should this be an “until further notice” sort of thing? (Which would lead to the question of notice from whom).

Ben.