IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Mon, 12 November 2018 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12823130E4A for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 08:03:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eXG-Oi88q_iP for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 08:03:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 751A412F1AC for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 08:03:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 08:03:07 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1542038587; bh=SGUzO05Rs67tT6xe8vSQzQdXPWGDU6BXDBP345RU7+A=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Aqxvl6eSq1aD9Oc9JznNC5rGSzu3xxZIAV7bJZ467yIwvDdJm49/KnWrc0T+NM0Ym BDwqk/wHNu4lQHSODwSJtoZwIeUCX/zHIdsvcddZVm8dm4kcdyqw3XZv1cgq9Jtpdp ySCOO88Cp8dNpytlBijvtv7BwKFAY59ZpM2YvXcM=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab5c792da7eefd8878da6930ce80b30312757ac2c492cf000000011801663b92a169ce168cd044@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980/437934967@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be9a43b691ac_751a3ff40ead45c0164883"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/4pGUZTnv0D26CcB8dHkc03H6X78>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 16:03:28 -0000

@kazuho I agree that is another solution. I would prefer that over repurposing the RETRY packet type. It would possibly add some complexity on how VN should work. Should servers advertise support of that version? If so, should QUIC-LB 'sanitize' it when sent out over the open internet?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980#issuecomment-437934967

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email