IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)

Nick Banks <notifications@github.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 06:04 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095CD127332 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:04:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XRzPomZ2T9vn for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:04:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-3.smtp.github.com (out-3.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5FE4127148 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 22:04:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 22:04:09 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1541657049; bh=BSIdKuTOSIwZN30R46ZzBw0NHUDEoYFfGRRUN9p8GDo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Gj6F5z+YYI8m5ij7EkKRboV9l+VpveMPrznppv0t/a+OouR32x6JjffshfGlCdOxy DE8c//5z+HpsDIqLGoD3214uf3KakSw/hOc+RmCEzlomof4kGRK0O3FUaREuzJ5H7i NVl4D5FglIlwivfF2NCQLTioSBBe4bHj2wMpUYys=
From: Nick Banks <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab011c028a53687090638f60e3a62545ac0d11d57d92cf0000000117fb93d992a169ce168cd044@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980/436883385@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be3d1d921590_58293fe8d18d45c4768ab"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: nibanks
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/gENJGSH9hUgXEF_-LEnvuFVOm5o>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 06:04:13 -0000

Having the QUIC-LB be a versioned interface is a pro in my mind, not a con. We would only updated version numbers if necessary, but having the ability to do so is a good thing.

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: Marten Seemann <notifications@github.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 9:00:43 PM
To: quicwg/base-drafts
Cc: Nick Banks; Mention
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)


I don't like the idea of using an additional packet type, especially since the current mapping has the nice property that we're actually using all 4 encodable packet types.
Using a new packet type, which is not an invariant, has the additional unpleasant property that you'll potentially have update QUIC-LB every time we're releasing a new QUIC version.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fquicwg%2Fbase-drafts%2Fissues%2F1980%23issuecomment-436873970&data=02%7C01%7Cnibanks%40microsoft.com%7C12f9f04c75a04e8fc31608d64537233b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636772500449656410&sdata=rF4itPQvy05OsEYjaWOGqowf7ztieLzM5Fw60LhumkY%3D&reserved=0>, or mute the thread<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FATtNBVDNSvOFaRmvHrboM_IjNg6ncJ3Uks5us7p7gaJpZM4YSmjs&data=02%7C01%7Cnibanks%40microsoft.com%7C12f9f04c75a04e8fc31608d64537233b%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C636772500449656410&sdata=Hq3mLBmLrN7IUfE7bdHOaQmtgmFxgdatRkSJIz0wlls%3D&reserved=0>.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980#issuecomment-436883385

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email