IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)

martinduke <notifications@github.com> Mon, 12 November 2018 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054E1130EE8 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:19:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oPF0Jb5Cqzpm for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:19:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o5.sgmail.github.com (o5.sgmail.github.com [192.254.113.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A54F130E92 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:19:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=crO28oQLupnbdGgTvawmvXC1hjA=; b=vT5g2VKcxK8S+7UI mHfLUhX9mNH7sMLvjUVCuNmzKFfdoJ+wwz7+kOIsK9JPg9BfAswOkpUFqevTjQO5 QLN9b66u5zsCAu5P4blLDSjdSwXNz4p7MqmjHkLXYSo6cqp34ndjW08wjRTSajdN hUmRJbThkhpcToVxrwzxfpZ8rRI=
Received: by filter1197p1las1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1197p1las1-24883-5BE9B62F-1D 2018-11-12 17:19:43.632041817 +0000 UTC m=+432274.988048895
Received: from github-lowworker-fc273f0.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.33]) by ismtpd0033p1mdw1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id 5GZ3RdjDT3aZMmS2XiQAEQ for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:19:43.531 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-fc273f0.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFA1C007C for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:19:43 +0000
From: martinduke <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab20c1fb27e225466373f0ff0f5cf1191355723c1992cf000000011801782f92a169ce168cd044@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980/437961591@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be9b62f6b53d_68093ff08b6d45b42117b3"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: martinduke
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak2isl7MBMwgVXxX++7snmL//BbO/Z9SocCIWq J/nmn6oxlc26EcFMjulsiZo0qKwaOpV4SYQyZ/OGY3lSHt5c3U9hRodhEc2+T4cToFmWJc2N52jMsK IiT+ESmeibabujSYao+bTsP3NvL/JWfdzJX5SLtkRA6txPv4e6L2vJ3yIYoYyK0YxWbCoF0l0ToMhS k=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/qw-REJMj3ukjcTb90YSg_PiRhl8>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:19:52 -0000

The objective we are trying to meet here is to support cases where the load balancer to server path is not trusted. To do this, we believe we need to pass through middleboxes that are dropping things that don't like QUIC.

At the same time, we are reluctant to make load balancers support a full implementation of QUIC.

I am fairly agnostic as to the solution as long as it looks "enough" like QUIC without requiring a full implementation. When there were more available codepoints, it was simple enough to just take 0xfb. I see the ossification problems with going to 8 codepoints instead of 4.

Whatever the design team comes up with will have to get ratified by the WG anyway. If the least objectionable choice is a different version, we can proceed with that.


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980#issuecomment-437961591

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email