Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)

Subodh Iyengar <notifications@github.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 03:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25E6130E23 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:08:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fnzC6daDtwcL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:08:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-10.smtp.github.com (out-10.smtp.github.com [192.30.254.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2B0C130DD3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2018 19:08:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 19:08:13 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1541646493; bh=MehLjTSKy88dS6HN23foTTIibZcJYr+HZW+xGmVxHVE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=e8pigDE+zEfxPvQ9Pi4ge4f3mE+BqabQ/sp3ylaCxP82i4W5w9XurIoDfPhCBnqAo vypHqj/HFtzqjfUiS1EF+IswzGrXb9OrF2yCcW5fJMsw89kITuPZPzEnxkfd55BG+x y7JGrBJUIIjAfcS14CX5E6j2kkDLMHs1NkmLJW+A=
From: Subodh Iyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab70ef39b30eaedc017aff6d930ed95807986722a992cf0000000117fb6a9d92a169ce168cd044@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980/436857959@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Reserve Long Header Packet Type for QUIC-LB (#1980)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5be3a89d1ff8e_339b3fdd7a2d45b44624c"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: siyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/VkCdQw6PCwMXLeXMu80RbI1tmYc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 03:08:16 -0000

I've spoken about this offline with @martinduke. I think that using a QUIC packet for this is not necessary at all and might be detrimental in some cases. For example, there is a circular dependency to talk to a particular server to assign it a connid when it doesn't currently have a connid assigned to it. 

I think this will open up a can of worms though. When we add a packet type for a lb packet, we might want to add a packet type for a health check packet, etc. and other use cases which adds up to several bits. 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1980#issuecomment-436857959