Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] editorial: This sentence was hard to parse for me (recovery) (#3383)

mirjak <> Wed, 22 January 2020 22:17 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731DD120131 for <>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:17:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0JdBpOqJjmlj for <>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B9E120819 for <>; Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:17:12 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1579731433; bh=qZrdxAJ3wX4cCMW7GCMF5a/duH31ObULabvg+3IbUc8=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=Tw5TK4hgBtBNEy1v/a6HeNRkMj1WqxXSPS8GoNolS4tNV1ZdQlFf8Z3ONXjsxStOQ Hsl9kRJJ68ctjdGeTfguNGgulgMBvV7v7GoZQtfwiYaZDICFS1abRBLQIU4LbnuwW8 q0scHJFhcMEWkB2665EVUYmnbzipJrJGDz3p9RmE=
From: mirjak <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3383/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] editorial: This sentence was hard to parse for me (recovery) (#3383)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e28c9e8d90d0_ee33fb5c1ecd964482ae"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mirjak
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 22:17:19 -0000

mirjak commented on this pull request.

> @@ -272,9 +272,10 @@ SHOULD NOT be used to update RTT estimates if it does not newly acknowledge the
 largest acknowledged packet.
 An RTT sample MUST NOT be generated on receiving an ACK frame that does not
-newly acknowledge at least one ack-eliciting packet.  A peer does not send an
-ACK frame on receiving only non-ack-eliciting packets, so an ACK frame that is
-subsequently sent can include an arbitrarily large Ack Delay field.  Ignoring
+newly acknowledge at least one ack-eliciting packet.  A peer does usally not


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: