IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest acked in ACK frame MUST NOT decrease (#2205)

Magnus Westerlund <notifications@github.com> Thu, 20 December 2018 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80C9130E1B for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 02:52:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 170_yqMBFINQ for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 02:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o11.sgmail.github.com (o11.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDA6F12F1A5 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 02:52:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=+p54cPJVllBt5ASmlLVX74m0x4Y=; b=XyQp5St6MPp1a9KO NIsZ9I3J1V07g+128lulu/6DUaP3PgYyOg4/xTwvf9KFvSNYoXpiBLYfQ1Jgs0kA CLEVfV2xKiY5P90t9ThZBB7+iBRAyqrmP78cAt15wmmLfM5c78XMZL1ZEwNx3J+Z wzBajlPnmyYB47F3KbQNNxAODqQ=
Received: by filter0335p1iad2.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter0335p1iad2-5987-5C1B7470-A 2018-12-20 10:52:32.199423235 +0000 UTC m=+34360.547188163
Received: from github-lowworker-0b1e58d.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.43]) by ismtpd0014p1iad2.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id oMs3GSMMQcGCB4swXAYkxg for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:52:32.223 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-0b1e58d.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BB23E0FDE for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 02:52:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:52:32 +0000
From: Magnus Westerlund <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab5261296b5a8ed50487c8f4b24ec43f80a5f039cf92cf000000011833367092a169ce1762ed93@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205/448955294@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Largest acked in ACK frame MUST NOT decrease (#2205)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c1b747034cf3_17c13fcc34cd45c038958e"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: gloinul
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak0ouGEMosJFxnlYe08YyDJco04k/DgjwmcvEX 9T8g9TJnnnSLdkHKfSrHrIcb9OdHopin0K2Nxa9/Jdfcki/UNyq9nZqE1UctXdsn61yV9jwJZKIyEI 0OizTZoB+cE9WE8xR67x2yrt9kLiNmgIcd4cXjGkf5q70qncxfj9BhVktLGj2aflaJPYnTqIGhliWf 4=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/J7y1gk3AGr8jrySyRyNpL43LMn4>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:52:36 -0000

ECN Validation as I currently understand it will not fail if the sender to receiver reordering happens as long as the ACKs from the receiver to sender are not reordered. So to my understanding what is missing is a requirement for the sender to no process verfication for out of order ACKs. It will not fail if the largest acknowledge is not increasing as the comparison is done on number of newly ACKed packets versus counts change. 


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2205#issuecomment-448955294

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email