Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] introduce a version alias mechanism (#2573)

MikkelFJ <> Fri, 19 April 2019 07:09 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC011202B8 for <>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.383
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVdw86uDpEMX for <>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED6E2120045 for <>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:09:44 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1555657784; bh=iSkWxzVPQAUjnC8LOaO/BzmP7CkpXZbaiYkrejraEXQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=0OQm1+o7yaD82/f0BOlb11DwFmnPn9PSbPsO6RfnRZ6C0gD6f9QLkgjNzF/YOv6mO i4bDrjH2Bq56prUr7f/UJfWsLcGVLtjJne2a3AiqbHVG8BdJ2XIQ290RoBiEFV6P5P p9XZtWH83M2NJcSof2II/rcUVx84l+w8KY7uNofw=
From: MikkelFJ <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2573/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] introduce a version alias mechanism (#2573)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb97438d42f0_4b1b3fe72c4cd968496212"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 07:09:47 -0000

If you can recognize the ODCID as being a Retry DCID you could.
For a truly original ODCID you shouldn't, I agree.
But it is not so much about blame, as it is about what LB can do and need to do.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: