IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] introduce a version alias mechanism (#2573)

MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com> Fri, 19 April 2019 07:01 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42F71202B4 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:01:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oa8q880u6iVq for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AB161202B3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:01:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:01:25 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1555657285; bh=3NyBLt8i4xQoFCcYkCldLNhER/MjSD3+OfzsDJ2rUfA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=i8L/mDiJkBv8JbYeWJN33vsG5+mzZ1Y/AY3h4xcn6QXa+GYgaZVQKPyF7Lx6lPCkM eyqTr5jkp1UgB3wOlCAUPIf2HZOWHp56eiHdpMhTiYQQiDsCUp87PUXV8f+OOw6BC1 2NZcW10bTAaCXeJeQDK8QtopJajcAJAXh6LNe0AU=
From: MikkelFJ <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJK7PRLXXH2VB7HZZ47N2Y2SMLEVBNHHBS6WUXE@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2573/c484786362@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2573@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2573@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] introduce a version alias mechanism (#2573)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cb972459d954_60a73ffd862cd96812576eb"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: mikkelfj
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/f_gxScSrGy1t0C7p-_XMiPGAmxU>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 07:01:29 -0000

> I am not sure why this affects load balancing at all. The CID is part of the invariants, so LBs should be able to read and parse the CID without regard for the other versions.

If the pool of servers handling one version is different from another pool, for example in a blue/green deployment. Since client decides ODCID, you have nothing but the version to route on. You could, however, use a retry get a new DCID so traffic will route correctly.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2573#issuecomment-484786362

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email