Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow PRIORITY frames referring to placeholders exceeding `SETTING_NUM_PLACEHOLDERS` (#2761)

Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com> Fri, 31 May 2019 18:44 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E47120379 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 11:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.463
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20=1.546, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nv63rPRGmmXO for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2019 11:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-22.smtp.github.com (out-22.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C31D120378 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2019 11:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 11:44:42 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1559328282; bh=lNTpOn3HbGxIm6CiMST/UedR7brvEhFVTTuh/8882/4=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=KAGmRFBuoUkuF3BZZNRWujoV8QctSvBlbXq55Pru4okxOoKkvXgwN4zpSGpTSYeoa EfazqlP1zw+A+Au9irA+71dKIFbUY7XKpAKtEB4LAfhUh/eO+lW9lPNraGnMBtI39+ bwi6j3vDzfqEdAbKq1bBDJhNsOO0OuqOFBTvR58M=
From: Lucas Pardue <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+AFTOJKZHBEVJ5VKNG4Z5ND5272UJVEVBNHHBVW7INY@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761/c497819963@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] allow PRIORITY frames referring to placeholders exceeding `SETTING_NUM_PLACEHOLDERS` (#2761)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5cf1761a636fb_17083fd613acd964260ea"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: LPardue
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/_bgRduD-giZGRAg9aNIO5VVASOA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 18:44:45 -0000

This change puts placeholders in the same camp as MAX_HEADER_LIST_SIZE, an advisory value. I also agree with your argument there, a limit that is ignored is kinda useless. 

What this change does allow is a fire and forget approach from the client. It gracefully fails because the client can't reliably validate that any prioritisationinformation was adhered to.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2761#issuecomment-497819963