IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SetLossDetectionTime negative timeout (#2052)

Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com> Wed, 28 November 2018 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces+848413-a050-quic-issues=ietf.org@sgmail.github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7E6130E90 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 17:59:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKtc56t4_PgL for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 17:59:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from o8.sgmail.github.com (o8.sgmail.github.com [167.89.101.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B3A130E83 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 17:59:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:list-id:list-archive:list-post:list-unsubscribe; s=s20150108; bh=PrdmdDHqjKlw39/dWR8Ijp0/RqU=; b=wds2sodnkHbSro5Y hU8O7K88EKivQEULvtyTXKvZKSXFNgUH7Uf8e4U+Td3qvH8k7M7uQeJr2Ql/fRe8 45XOWRw8s0PM3Zis7MnYs/KiDLwN/Abc9iNTvyF6GLcjxGzaA8E3Tvel67+KyCi4 QxDp3fndur1x8JhauMtHQmfS47A=
Received: by filter1509p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1509p1mdw1-4258-5BFDF663-1C 2018-11-28 01:58:59.714761288 +0000 UTC m=+1045802.571062690
Received: from github-lowworker-39ccb07.cp1-iad.github.net (unknown [192.30.252.40]) by ismtpd0039p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id QD1ft0hrQyy32Lre9QLe3Q for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:58:59.683 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from github.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by github-lowworker-39ccb07.cp1-iad.github.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ADC4017F2 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2018 17:58:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:58:59 +0000
From: Kazuho Oku <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab9d939287c69c1166ebeafa9f9cbe2b21b90eeef792cf000000011815b86392a169ce16e756f7@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052/442289506@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SetLossDetectionTime negative timeout (#2052)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bfdf663a1249_2a783f8e76ed45c45584b5"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-SG-EID: l64QuQ2uJCcEyUykJbxN122A6QRmEpucztpreh3Pak1couF572Q1hY6IuTwb+6JcqnKMzwaFjnqU2P bQGxLNjpgnuvzKlp6K3+MQd/yRFkC8/pHmuHVFkaJ+FsCQuljI7400+MbuX67YmuNhvANN5PnBe7Y2 a3OpCMb1rI+uUyA8QGEyMu0M4WtB85sYaD8dCmeI0sljUhf49BGyTInWbkaRQCfQAyEjka70DVF702 c=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/d7aqIKDHa8eWM0ePqGWNSTYUexo>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 01:59:02 -0000

For somebody unfamiliar with congestion control, it helps if the pseudo-code in the specification was designed to always return a non-negative timeout, because then, you could check the value to see if you have implemented it correctly.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052#issuecomment-442289506

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email