Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SetLossDetectionTime negative timeout (#2052)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Tue, 27 November 2018 04:08 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D94C130E14 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:08:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.46
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.46 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LqBqF6tMa9K7 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-5.smtp.github.com (out-5.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4D49127333 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:08:52 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:08:52 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1543291732; bh=h7FvUlgOfI7/qlC0wNpggx9BakQZvWT/lfrgWQam2ok=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=q0Iu1hYq5dnuAq70WltjIpBLKiYWaSsjHRvwfQvMrvokQMaIOE08a2TXsAWHXVq7G fxQ44QDcRp/8W2CTQF4Br+SIQFP2UI5jjQvQsntgm7Kij1yPoVMscbsPgic1jmPqNU m1PlpSGclCPnFS1Efzim3Wy0tKFNY8UCjTvkJJAk=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4abdcf08066cab5087a46f14d508ec990b1bf7966e092cf000000011814855492a169ce16e756f7@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052/441899285@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] SetLossDetectionTime negative timeout (#2052)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5bfcc354efb3_60823fc2a9ed45bc889520"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/tXQZJopgHx_QqKZTzBtEYxKNXFc>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 04:08:54 -0000

This could use some clarifying, but that shouldn't happen. loss_time is set to 0 if loss_time is smaller than now, see DetectLostPackets() which sets loss_time. Specifically,
```
    if (time_since_sent > delay_until_lost ||
        delta > reordering_threshold):
      sent_packets.remove(unacked.packet_number)
      if (unacked.retransmittable):
        lost_packets.insert(unacked)
    else if (loss_time == 0 && delay_until_lost != infinite):
      loss_time = now() + delay_until_lost - time_since_sent
```
Since loss_time is *not set* when time_since_sent > delay_until_lost, it remains set to 0. This means an ER timer does not need to be set (and is not set in SetLossDetectionTimer(), which is exactly what you want, since setting a timer only makes sense if the event is in the future. In this case, loss_time was before now(), and so, the loss event happens now, causing OnPacketsLost() to be called at the end of DetectLostPackets().


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2052#issuecomment-441899285