Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ekr editorial 17 3 (#2164)

janaiyengar <notifications@github.com> Sat, 15 December 2018 00:36 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2F31313B6 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:36:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.781
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.781 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1.46, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FUZZY_CREDIT=1.678, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LiEfXsZaiY6R for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:36:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out-2.smtp.github.com (out-2.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B30C1313B0 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:36:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:36:23 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1544834183; bh=pCwWVyBfaY2az+KFzFEPxywtATXGgCjQzi38bhDZtXw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=QglXlTr2iJwPoiGHNdbyXQt0+kcgBBY8u/bPIupa5meN0CJ45TWpEYhMiuKJOzSVd 3IRcTBGBnQsa0EAc+HdF7LG0kYFLkzUSF0uvEy49RfSM7guw7V+yq+0I4TvX803abu yIAKT7A1juyLtkh/Mp6rfS/XLjKfmApCFodNDpys=
From: janaiyengar <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab5d8e31e7ffad4dffdb5cfdf1c572dfebee7cf57d92cf00000001182c0e8792a169ce174c6329@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164/review/185330931@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Ekr editorial 17 3 (#2164)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5c144c87a4270_246d3fdcab4d45b46017a6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: janaiyengar
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/e6K-T7UIEAf2K2Dx95gX6cM1tmY>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 00:36:27 -0000

janaiyengar commented on this pull request.



> @@ -3847,10 +3858,11 @@ MUST include the value of the Original Destination Connection ID field of the
 Retry packet (that is, the Destination Connection ID field from the client's
 first Initial packet) in the transport parameter.
 
-If the client received and processed a Retry packet, it validates that the
-original_connection_id transport parameter is present and correct; otherwise, it
-validates that the transport parameter is absent.  A client MUST treat a failed
-validation as a connection error of type TRANSPORT_PARAMETER_ERROR.
+If the client received and processed a Retry packet, it MUST validate
+that the original_connection_id transport parameter is present and
+correct; otherwise, it validates that the transport parameter is
+absent.  A client MUST treat a failed validation as a connection error
+of type TRANSPORT_PARAMETER_ERROR.

Hah, yes. Suggested above.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2164#discussion_r241927749