IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make EOED transmission optional in QUIC, please (#1518)

ianswett <notifications@github.com> Sun, 02 September 2018 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@github.com>
X-Original-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719C9130DF5 for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 15:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T4klbdS85rtF for <quic-issues@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 15:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-4.smtp.github.com (out-4.smtp.github.com [192.30.252.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22A0E130DF3 for <quic-issues@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Sep 2018 15:11:07 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2018 15:11:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; s=pf2014; t=1535926266; bh=YmaIZjOlvtuDK7T0E7Y5//vthpewMqynGtA7x9GHscA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=iBd2OiqGG7N9kfFG5OZVXXn4AfiCXr8ylaXNYpBHiS7B/buvtTM2vGbJiimWZBpKQ dBz02MWPjgBDD4L/J7ItXEntbnQZ8npmyXdbGaSfL7vBVfqsvSf2Soyna9+haFt0iO HQ/tqpORg7kIkXNoTEFT5NWuPOaLsQXReeS/3U0g=
From: ianswett <notifications@github.com>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <reply+0166e4ab17d28b39ca87111771f89e4207956d303ff1899892cf0000000117a421fa92a169ce1427404b@reply.github.com>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <base-drafts@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1518/417963345@github.com>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1518@github.com>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1518@github.com>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Make EOED transmission optional in QUIC, please (#1518)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5b8c5ffa80ed4_b613fb3baad45b439327"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: ianswett
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-GitHub-Recipient-Address: quic-issues@ietf.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic-issues/mS0d2NopVO4MXR0jVHMRU_EE_kA>
X-BeenThere: quic-issues@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <quic-issues.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic-issues/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic-issues@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic-issues>, <mailto:quic-issues-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2018 22:11:09 -0000

Re #2, it it possible the client misses an acknowledgement of the EOED.  If this happens, we either need to rely on implicit acknowledgement, which we've avoided so far, or the client retransmitting EOED and the server ACKing it.  Or never stop ACKing EOED until you know it's been received, but that seems more complex?

Re #3, I had higher numbered packets in mind, due to reordering.  But this seems very similar to how changing key phases would work, which matches my mental model of the 0RTT to 1RTT transition.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/1518#issuecomment-417963345

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email