Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify and split the "malformed" definition (#3352)

Mike Bishop <> Mon, 20 January 2020 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92647120841 for <>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:34:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.596
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.596 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28=1.404, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YYY9H-jDf_V8 for <>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF6B5120801 for <>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:34:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390F66E04D4 for <>; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:34:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1579545244; bh=Etahit0zbMAl8ZVObtNaw704RLSivrbAW+iSgeyQ8NA=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=puf0gU9JReNL80jU6CLtZc9Bsvk0ffh1BM973Zp7MVCIsFLK0JH1iJsysb0JPBbF8 uVHV/WSIzKaGq5afgCaVF1K31vDkqFAEOg1HTkQL8S8RNtjo/6WXALCdC4l7++fhyc lRNzfEbcgaZ7Lhu80nM5SHdIgjfq3CqyiyLAcYfs=
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:34:04 -0800
From: Mike Bishop <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3352/review/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/pull/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] Clarify and split the "malformed" definition (#3352)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5e25f29c2f2c1_526a3f9b43ccd968317674"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: MikeBishop
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:34:12 -0000

MikeBishop commented on this pull request.

>  A server MAY send one or more PUSH_PROMISE (see {{frame-push-promise}}) or
 DUPLICATE_PUSH (see {{frame-duplicate-push}}) frames before, after, or
 interleaved with the frames of a response message. These PUSH_PROMISE and
 DUPLICATE_PUSH frames are not part of the response; see {{server-push}} for
-more details.
+more details.  These frames are not permitted in pushed responses.

Fixed, but I'm going to reverse that.  I like Kazuho's logic that misuse of a frame is a connection error, because the peer is the only one who could have generated it.  I'm going to make these H3_FRAME_UNEXPECTED instead.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: