IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] Call for charter consensus

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 24 January 2019 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1319E131262 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:58:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0B9tnkrplCSm for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:58:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37CBF131218 for <rats@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 08:58:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost2.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c8:406a:91ff:fe74:f2b7]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x0OGwXUr025829; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:58:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from client-0065.vpn.uni-bremen.de (client-0065.vpn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.107.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43lpJT34zSz1Br6; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:58:33 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <6C7E1E60-2507-4B1E-98DB-AB572C239ACD@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:58:32 +0100
Cc: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 570041911.1069551-1c0f8ad997f135544a63d97e10ca7928
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EAF28F01-82FF-4349-A990-D4DA6535BF90@tzi.org>
References: <6C7E1E60-2507-4B1E-98DB-AB572C239ACD@cisco.com>
To: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/Ft2Va2OhQTYMTTNH5k0WItyiZAk>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Call for charter consensus
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:58:49 -0000

On Jan 18, 2019, at 04:38, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello RATS participants:
>  
> At the virtual meeting on 1/16/2019, there was consensus [1] that we should pursue chartering a Working Group with the text reflected in [2].
>  
> We need to continue this discussion on the email list as well as gauge continued interest in participating in this work.  Please do so by responding to the following questions:
> 	• Do you support this charter text (full text also provided at the end of email or at [1])?  Or do you have objections or blocking concerns?

I support the charter text as the initial charter of the WG.
(As I said in the call, I believe that, if the WG successfully addresses its work, there will be other items we want to make sure are being addressed; but this can wait a little until the WG gets some real work done and submitted to the IESG.)

> 	• Are you willing to author or participate in the development of the drafts of this WG?

Yes.

> 	• Are you willing to help review the drafts of this WG?

Yes.

> 	• Are you interested in implementing drafts of this WG?

(I’d expect students to do much of the actual implementation work, but in the sense of making the implementation happen and having a hand in that:)  Yes.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email