Re: [Rats] Call for charter consensus

[Henk Birkholz <[e-mail]>]

On 1/18/19 4:38 AM, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) wrote:
> Hello RATS participants:
> 
> At the virtual meeting on 1/16/2019, there was consensus [1] that we 
> should pursue chartering a Working Group with the text reflected in [2].
> 
> We need to continue this discussion on the email list as well as gauge 
> continued interest in participating in this work.  Please do so by 
> responding to the following questions:
> 
>  1. Do you support this charter text (full text also provided at the end
>     of email or at [1])?  Or do you have objections or blocking concerns?

+1

Comment/non-blocking: As highlighted by the minutes: the scope of 
initial assertions and the corresponding demarcation line wrt assertion 
semantics & reference values are topics to be addressed by the working 
group and not necessarily to be specified by the charter explicitly. If 
there is a list in the charter, staying exemplary and steering the 
course would be their purpose, I think.  Personally, I am leaning 
towards of including that as a working group goal.

>  2. Are you willing to author or participate in the development of the
>     drafts of this WG?

+1

>  3. Are you willing to help review the drafts of this WG?

+1


>  4. Are you interested in implementing drafts of this WG?

+1

> 
> Please provide comments including proposed text changes ASAP to provide 
> ample time for discussion.  This call for consensus ends on February 1, 
> 2019.
> 
> Thanks, Roman and Nancy
> 
> [1] Minutes sent: 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/xEwczqnoNgyBYlRTKg35Yo4ccWY
> 
> [2] Updated charter sent: 
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/MQLZIkIK23ZlSBMB5wJjo71bOr0

Viele Grüße,

Henk

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RATS mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats
>