IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] Call for charter consensus

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 18 January 2019 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350F5124D68 for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:27:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rj-TJ2NKrxbZ for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:27:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745AD1200D7 for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:27:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D13380BE; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:27:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id AC330CA3; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:27:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB14B8C; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:27:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>
cc: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <6C7E1E60-2507-4B1E-98DB-AB572C239ACD@cisco.com>
References: <6C7E1E60-2507-4B1E-98DB-AB572C239ACD@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:27:44 -0500
Message-ID: <21453.1547821664@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/Q4zpF12EgEm1wJmJSKo-rvRq-eQ>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Call for charter consensus
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:27:48 -0000

Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) <ncamwing@cisco.com> wrote:
    > 1 Do you support this charter text (full text also provided at the end of
    > email or at [1])? Or do you have objections or blocking concerns?

I think the charter so far is good enough to start.

    > 2 Are you willing to author or participate in the development of the
    > drafts of this WG?

Yes... Though I am now uncertain about how much time I will get to spend.
(I thought it was going to be lots)

    > 3 Are you willing to help review the drafts of this WG?

Yes.

    > 4 Are you interested in implementing drafts of this WG?

Interested, but not resourced to do so.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email