IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Rats] Call for charter consensus

Giridhar Mandyam <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com> Fri, 18 January 2019 14:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rats@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6251277BB for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:52:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qti.qualcomm.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QdGvrM0ynkLT for <rats@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:52:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com (alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A9C412785F for <rats@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:52:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1547823145; x=1579359145; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=WsX9wFaIf0d9vufPlZOFArOCtjE7G4phOW/AuYFQ3NY=; b=KXrH6MF0IdvPSIEcDwdL9QbJs+F11l/TnPTDLn9q0tBJrOhlWqnnP/17 lzuym64+zgRZSDRjPk0b2Pd7wxk21A5PsnxSQ864jHw1dAKjEswXHJMcW ZaDCOAaw99E7eHB546vbaw4k6/Cjk/Jqk5IRxZ//bZTvjyp3dlLIWxFM+ 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.56,491,1539673200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="24718560"
Received: from unknown (HELO ironmsg04-sd.qualcomm.com) ([10.53.140.144]) by alexa-out-sd-02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2019 06:52:24 -0800
Received: from nasanexm01d.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.84]) by ironmsg04-sd.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 18 Jan 2019 06:52:23 -0800
Received: from NASANEXM01C.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.83) by NASANEXM01D.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:52:23 -0800
Received: from NASANEXM01C.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.83]) by NASANEXM01C.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.83]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 06:52:23 -0800
From: Giridhar Mandyam <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>
To: "rats@ietf.org" <rats@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for charter consensus
Thread-Index: AQHUrt88ycN1OAAxL0q/VhBcqW5yZaW1G5dA
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:52:22 +0000
Message-ID: <9897ebadb131489abbfea1260a0b11a8@NASANEXM01C.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <6C7E1E60-2507-4B1E-98DB-AB572C239ACD@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <6C7E1E60-2507-4B1E-98DB-AB572C239ACD@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [199.106.107.6]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9897ebadb131489abbfea1260a0b11a8NASANEXM01Cnaqualcommco_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/_yi7yEHX90ut7nC_XPqrKVTu8Gc>
Subject: Re: [Rats] Call for charter consensus
X-BeenThere: rats@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Remote Attestation Procedures <rats.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rats/>
List-Post: <mailto:rats@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rats>, <mailto:rats-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 14:52:29 -0000

  1.  Do you support this charter text (full text also provided at the end of email or at [1])?  Or do you have objections or blocking concerns?

Yes, I support.  I also agree with the concerns outlined in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/Md9Wo9uoM1t-aplZjUNA4MncOZQ so won’t object if minor changes are made.


  1.  Are you willing to author or participate in the development of the drafts of this WG?

Yes.  I am already a co-editor of the EAT draft and would be open to continuing development of https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mandyam-tokbind-attest-06 in this working group.


  1.  Are you willing to help review the drafts of this WG?

Yes.


  1.  Are you interested in implementing drafts of this WG?

Yes.

-Giri Mandyam

From: RATS <rats-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 7:38 PM
To: rats@ietf.org
Subject: [Rats] Call for charter consensus


CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
Hello RATS participants:

At the virtual meeting on 1/16/2019, there was consensus [1] that we should pursue chartering a Working Group with the text reflected in [2].

We need to continue this discussion on the email list as well as gauge continued interest in participating in this work.  Please do so by responding to the following questions:

  1.  Do you support this charter text (full text also provided at the end of email or at [1])?  Or do you have objections or blocking concerns?
  2.  Are you willing to author or participate in the development of the drafts of this WG?
  3.  Are you willing to help review the drafts of this WG?
  4.  Are you interested in implementing drafts of this WG?

Please provide comments including proposed text changes ASAP to provide ample time for discussion.  This call for consensus ends on February 1, 2019.

Thanks, Roman and Nancy

[1] Minutes sent: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/xEwczqnoNgyBYlRTKg35Yo4ccWY
[2] Updated charter sent: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/MQLZIkIK23ZlSBMB5wJjo71bOr0

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email