IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] deprecating relref

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 10 April 2021 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209643A3182; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 05:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KgzlMWG3Zeoc; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 05:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7615E3A3180; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 05:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FAC2F407F0; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 05:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9D4F407F0 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 05:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ii018Ggmy6OP for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 05:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAE43F407EE for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 05:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dc178.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.193.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FHYyM6BQMz107c; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 14:21:31 +0200 (CEST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <de7524e7-6ce1-033b-b419-629aeedcbc75@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 14:21:28 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 639750088.747104-cdf714d94981f0b7042c86a92eebc475
Message-Id: <984CB8B9-AC06-460F-86C0-980DA24A7ED6@tzi.org>
References: <20210409232929.D971772962C5@ary.qy> <B4642FE5-4CC2-4D4B-A475-7067BCA2D17F@ietf.org> <a1a9788e-ce74-c996-876e-b7d7f9fed42@taugh.com> <F32A78CB-51F8-45BE-8F80-04915EBE2B4D@tzi.org> <de7524e7-6ce1-033b-b419-629aeedcbc75@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] deprecating relref
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On 2021-04-10, at 09:34, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> I haven't tried it yet, but xml2rfc *does* have an "unprep" mode:
> 
>> --unprep              reduce prepped xml to unprepped

Nice!
I completely missed that.

In a sample, this worked well for me.
It left in a few too many derivedCounter attributes (in ol>li), and it took away all CDATA sections (which is only relevant if work continues on the XML), but apart from these, the upconversion looked perfect.
(I’m not sure I understand the sequence it chose for the individual attributes, so it is not always easy to do a diff, but that is of course a known problem with diffing XML.)

Grüße, Carsten

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email