IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] deprecating relref

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Mon, 26 April 2021 17:30 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CC13A29FB; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E19sKYTTOD-0; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71F7E3A29F5; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:30:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35432F40709; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D006DF40709 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pbn_cR7nyok1 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-33.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-33.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.33]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B57ADF40706 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2021 10:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=ug7nbtf4gccmlpwj322ax3p6ow6yfsug; d=amazonses.com; t=1619458222; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:Feedback-ID; bh=rBJZAtQT6tK3hr9tcLwUiBH18C6bwW+EibNS2nh6cd0=; b=G4/biuFNngPv525/LKrfYGTT4OAZXD1p3iaFE0tTOJydqkoPk6Eiu0Ze9FOBcFUs 95ZdVslJ3mG7DqzoYCu3KBqE5Zfd1NGNcelr4XZfWy6CR9gpo1sYIcGotj8VURtsYVX zqUuyC3f3ykDCuYRCTS7avJJgQfqO/uxYaluA/LI=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
In-Reply-To: <FB64D868-0E6D-40E7-BC6C-EFC277F8643F@tzi.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 17:30:22 +0000
Message-ID: <010001790f3b6765-aafcddcc-1236-4e48-9646-8472908058a6-000000@email.amazonses.com>
References: <060157d4-68a0-9729-cf0e-9eaa38ce45d8@mozilla.com> <0100017900eba149-1ec61a85-0716-484f-9772-3938d37392e8-000000@email.amazonses.com> <b44e7c12-1b15-0615-1871-9dce7b891f08@mozilla.com> <010001790ed09edc-faa57af2-36be-4ab4-8b4e-7ee426d2e772-000000@email.amazonses.com> <FB64D868-0E6D-40E7-BC6C-EFC277F8643F@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2021.04.26-54.240.8.33
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] deprecating relref
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

That text looks broken ;)


1) typically, this is "#" for HTML documents

The tools should know what kind of document is being rendered and use the right syntax - right?


2) If the reference is not an RFC or Internet-Draft in the v3 format, and no "relative" attribute has been provided, it is an error.

Shouldn’t this sentence be under the “relative” section?


What the <xref> link for the example given in my last message?


Kent



> On Apr 26, 2021, at 11:48 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2021-04-26, at 17:33, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Would this work, or planned to work?
> 
> The specific syntax that you are using is broken, but please see:
> 
> https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/xml2rfc-doc.html#name-xref-2
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 

_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email