Re: [rfc-i] deprecating relref

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Sat, 10 April 2021 07:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714B53A2780; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (body has been altered)" header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ZgNttX5QdnU; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB403A277D; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD08F407D4; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4F2F407D4 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EhnMb2qMXdOC for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:34:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB33F407D2 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 00:34:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1618040071; bh=hFdoqp9nnMwmLMbmbqFzRVuUneUxZPeZWVbwU7eN0PM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ZnWPqad/e7eWPTCUaTQ/TPcvZinf3cdwzsj0IrDS7OSp1LFBMP7XHg00448ZBF86W e0dYY99sO6m/m7lpvsvCXcMKLtYmLMoo8htrIbXGNEI817lweY/iLhucCOKuEoU6N4 zwfRCQ6jJFfNDVSLIB4ZE1980OSPrGjN/I58Orf4=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([217.251.132.96]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mwfai-1ll8tJ1IyI-00y7AA for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:34:31 +0200
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
References: <20210409232929.D971772962C5@ary.qy> <B4642FE5-4CC2-4D4B-A475-7067BCA2D17F@ietf.org> <a1a9788e-ce74-c996-876e-b7d7f9fed42@taugh.com> <F32A78CB-51F8-45BE-8F80-04915EBE2B4D@tzi.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <de7524e7-6ce1-033b-b419-629aeedcbc75@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 09:34:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F32A78CB-51F8-45BE-8F80-04915EBE2B4D@tzi.org>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:GRmrZswa/1mHlIN+KEA5NC1kCMoBlaS8lWbTJ8SGrZeF2j9nV65 u4PAgnCBYjRKcwf4F8igWY+EoKuW0z5iyM0Lfs6tZDJbt61lPUdLL5FEqYq3BchwYFOPiVw jKg+f6Mhrzwc4J+/iPDwZ/qpVoq7Tl6zKhEnzzw9umb0jWMx9o88EasQP6WQd61ERC5YFgu HwaprrvS1wfuWVVj45Gaw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:OsgSIEFl2Q0=:CWJ3hJ8U/OpMNOqb3loNjD vOlo+OMwLbB1iWY+6y7vBnQ1bcO7eFI+V7vHttAjIzzZ/VEdMUqJwJ9+J6Tb2lCQcA953VN+X TExj1F22JZhImQwZ8XKSX/osfFw9Cpwduu9go9JGUR5eo+lZxfW4PUZAFndLpu01vdkNTUiof Wbgtrm55Hk4sYj2KDhw9VkqTkjY3k4Q1ru5Txt0T8GnvjPTCC4pUOQeimDe3hulpLwmtr0JiH UqtZHDwpUgqx5ZImOevtXdmY+3q+tomPDQH187CShYKpmKDGqZHcLfywIp+2BuyApiqxkzyye VKr072xZZxjXYJ/GlIyU7V47Ka2lhcOHBKhpZerxdEeoOtaAYJCHukagz2mPKn6brys/7KWdF XzyDt2wtV7Z0pS2/J5V95q/YCzmAWJir42+yhGTlgWV3GmZut5/LIxfe+F9RTX6Kdi/JYhrnS RCyDPpNPGqAeb2o2tAMNuBY//xGKqPLlKZqu+mYiYlKxgbESRcV2Bc7GMnEl9MpGthffeBxcp PKQvSMSAyH157BNZhl4ppXd2Ucpl1ICXbQj+ekb5jyq9sbBD9ntdgmDyUAFdVEYomxCp55p2A W5zz5OtTULJM9dzlt2iiUo6Du47pmI9Z2NW36vtwEZUFp2Z3VtIDvi1zxwjOTEqUZI3i2SXY8 zzyD3a+8xJ/9DQqdWbk+WU1ZXCypKvHX0lglny1CH5wXU0Bc9WGTLVg8ZDT0H7WkxsBOmIe11 JxtUnFtk0vZLegBoU16Opcmuyn1cAEaefCM3z2gj4GKVinfncRSPmuvkskHA9I0MxULv8xIoI FRTYLqmcQSaMSUTH4Ls8/ei9ae1omAIgmjRv4KMvOQo1lBtvmas9tEJ8AVL8vRAv8MENDjqL0 EZTypZBHP/F3bxuaPAIN0nmbpaOq2RjJgUErRKDJTU6sLy1ZyJYbpNmsV7HCcWWbnqy3z650B m3jWgF31nYMhnMXn9WdXpwV3FtPmQXeZKkK2uvppKYNV2X6FGA5k3bXrufyqivyqHvaGuwhLq pN94mJlsKnnND8UdTXpocEIW3yNCVkaJ4csogql/6wielqI0oLFJBdaUXwczTfvLwaZo5hQTc ts4043jWWWzzJB+/C6hQq9sht21/omYMTzajAb7L/Rt5MJyqe8HcYfiuW0KwRgxATVPHCchEF hP0kfLFJ8Zu6na6elo5yfMOrXhMUMKo7J6cH0+LYt2RMRoA5Kwa99bu1+a1oRkTU73JY0=
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] deprecating relref
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

Am 10.04.2021 um 08:07 schrieb Carsten Bormann:
> On 10. Apr 2021, at 01:55, John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>>
>> If you want to edit something, un-prep it with a tool that has whatever defaults you like, so it takes out anything that matches its defaults.
>
> Yep, we need that unprep tool.
> It would not only take out default values, but also all the generated/derived data.
>
> Is the unprep tool an any roadmap?
>
> Grüße, Carsten

I haven't tried it yet, but xml2rfc *does* have an "unprep" mode:

>  --unprep              reduce prepped xml to unprepped

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest