IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] New proposal/New SOW comment period

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Sat, 31 August 2019 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433D11200F9 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7XdQCZMwaNDO for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F257E12001E for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75077B80C71; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB40B80C71 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:43:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VC_x77rtgZ2O for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62807B80C6E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Jude (73.180.8.170) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:43:52 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Christian Huitema' <huitema@huitema.net>
References: <4675DA5C-0CFE-4E02-980D-770B17907D35@encrypted.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20190830124138.08d4ab38@elandnews.com> <5dd85c7b-84d4-9192-db70-28e61ed3bf01@nostrum.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190830214019.0ba94918@elandnews.com> <740F4638-B988-4FB3-97EE-8EAEF366D521@akamai.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190831082218.0ba64748@elandnews.com> <FD1BA644-68A7-45E9-BAC7-16FB75F7D1FD@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <FD1BA644-68A7-45E9-BAC7-16FB75F7D1FD@huitema.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:43:50 -0700
Message-ID: <02e801d56023$a7de6730$f79b3590$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJ6Oda1o3S6w/V8lfTgFFu5lhF1hwHTvQ2LArrMj+YCbsIdfQMI0GCYAes/49oBTxvwKaVhzLzA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Originating-IP: [73.180.8.170]
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] [Rsoc] New proposal/New SOW comment period
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, rsoc@iab.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

So the piece of mail from Russ makes for an interesting starting point for
discussion of what you believe this new person should be doing.

He has asked for a new feature, change bars, to be added to the v3
vocabulary and provided an example of when this has been done in the past.
This means that the person in charge needs to look at this feature request
and decide what to do with it.  Except for a decision to punt, this is a
decision that has long term effects on the RFC series.  Should this be
allowed?  If allowed how is it presented for the different document formats?
What is the mechanism that this is done in the vocabulary?  Does this mean
that we should have the full set of change bar features or not?  The current
document just has bars down the side, but does not have any insert or delete
markers.

Is this the type of decision that this new Temp RFC Series Manager supposed
to be making?  

Jim


_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email