IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 13 September 2019 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B776E1200F9 for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ix58gM5Pp45S for <ietfarch-rfc-interest-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F1C71200B5 for <rfc-interest-archive-eekabaiReiB1@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21FB5B80C4E; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Delivered-To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B08B80C4E for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rfc-editor.org
Authentication-Results: rfcpa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from rfc-editor.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rfcpa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H36zCWJ-YbEL for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) by rfc-editor.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22699B80C4D for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:43:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id a1so5812799ioc.6 for <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=PV+7DHdNhvtBwhEjK/u+3xCzNql+dR5l/NbeqRnVDws=; b=hHktI0IFJN+aCRMOzBsGdvVv6sSYv6mFQJDiW8RdeflwrajpJbOz9TwR1+OBAPW3RT x9kfzM7UHQq870XO0d+Y8QVdSZwfVqgdpSkZR2FYJoOGultzoYsvXKSyaM2sY4s9LiNZ n5eMTrqfrTLGmT0RxPzyR3iH8iLM6DBT3qkWofQjAV27cElmm/QB6LUm9JhD71FJTUh1 AhTSB+Sge8Wwya1c5uhtGTM4/sV6hwQgbJStrwLT1Dca9lqgLrz3okhfGK8hEW7Dq7sf 6NbF8WK8s6FDgNr6MHKd6cryM/H8U3iDIczfhgtp57SxzCw8+VnSnZavxxaAiXfjZ0wi emag==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=PV+7DHdNhvtBwhEjK/u+3xCzNql+dR5l/NbeqRnVDws=; b=ka9b4Q86rBr5rd9d3n7BfloHl8r7n/pmwv9ckO7E7khXwlRq1sDqspgX0852Xq2eIL cS00f4YFfTABJAjRoRr7zwELLBA3Qnd12BiO8aHSjhyvFpjbVybGRgEHnslVjKb69eou NvBtRxELy60gFfAipFyR0asGot54z3tzkW1OAjM714YPEl4lffKYP1HpDQ+qHQcWiLTu b4/t5v++p2whW3X5kfrgOHd1gpgED0jBOJnhHdmBMhanoy4sZMSJWGTw6kmOGue7wSmH /Vo/eZ3gfdsX1J6RbbR2KvoBhQ7NbCnjpiJQNOje7ocXCNr1dke7oVa339ElsgRU7hKn BLvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVhtdpblCaSrCs0Y/3ap3GgbhOSfAzq5jEdy/BeqeQpHRIFT5Ki WUi3iTRCJGO3eh/MJcQCaVyHNQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxe766iIIjgCIlOoROfFPeLH09uahKkJJDy78helqvZEZBF30sUNHCSA7fHO0jHjPFLXiHeGw==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:89cb:: with SMTP id a11mr777868iot.159.1568393043233; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:380:6937:7e3:49f8:d983:b006:e11? ([2600:380:6937:7e3:49f8:d983:b006:e11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m5sm1928885ioh.69.2019.09.13.09.44.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:44:01 -0500
Message-Id: <A6757275-5977-43C3-9EDD-B01FD550E61E@fugue.com>
References: <E0AA9720-A0BF-486C-AFD6-0675FDF1D0A3@encrypted.net>
In-Reply-To: <E0AA9720-A0BF-486C-AFD6-0675FDF1D0A3@encrypted.net>
To: Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17A836)
Subject: Re: [rfc-i] New proposal/New SOW comment period
X-BeenThere: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the RFC series and RFC Editor functions." <rfc-interest.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest>, <mailto:rfc-interest-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, iab@iab.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org
Sender: rfc-interest <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org>

On Sep 13, 2019, at 11:34, Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net> wrote:
> You can't beat up the IAB and RSOC for steering the process in some (potential) nefarious way, then effectively do the exact same and ask the community to bless it in the week left of a comment period.

The way I am reading this is that you are saying that changes as a result of comments made during the comment period are not expected to change the outcome. Is that what you intended to communicate?
_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email