Re: [Rfcplusplus] IRTF stream considerations

[Allison Mankin <[e-mail]>]

Hi Eliot, I see HRPC as a New Thing (though it need not be so forever). It
mingles social/political science research with protocol research.

There’s another angle on how we handled the HRPC research considerations
document, as well, which is that IRTF can have more varied consenses.
RG/IRSG consensus can be different in scope from the IETF-wide scope of
IETF LC/IESG Evaluation.

On Wednesday, 11 July 2018, Eliot Lear <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi Allison and thanks.  I'd like to test you on one point:
>
> On 11.07.18 19:26, Allison Mankin wrote:
>
> We in IRTF do have some work close to production, for example, CFRG crypto
> recommendations. I would want to talk with IESG about appropriate AD
> sponsorship when that would be the best context for a draft.
>
> Other work we would like to place into an IRTF stream with a new brand. I
> expect us to start developing an open, academically reviewed
> proceedings/journal soon, to best serve our researcher contributions. It
> will focus on applied research and running code, similar to ANRW.
>
>
> What would have been your preferred handling of the human rights
> considerations work?  Is that closer to a CFRG recommendation or a new
> Thing?  Please keep in mind that many of us were comfortable with that
> document going out through the IRTF as it was, precisely because it WASN'T
> an IETF document.
>
> Eliot
>