Re: [Roll] WG call to adopt draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03

[Abdussalam Baryun <[e-mail]>]

I agree with situation interoperability for the doc as you state in
your message, however, I ment that the interoperability among
different implemetation of the protocol. Will you include that in
draft as well?

AB

On 2/21/13, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>>>>>> "Abdussalam" == Abdussalam Baryun <[e-mail]>
>>>>>> writes:
>     Abdussalam> IMHO, I don't think the draft is about interoperability,
>     Abdussalam> nor commercial issues. The draft is an applicability
>     Abdussalam> draft, it helps users to use the protocol in such
>     Abdussalam> environment or applications,
>
> If there is anything in the document which is not essential for
> interoperability then it can be removed from the document.
>
> RFC6550 and friends (including the 6lowpan and 6man things) have given
> us palette of options.  The purpose of this document is how to apply
> those options to a specific situation.  This document *MUST* explain
> what options *MUST* be present in a device in order to interoperate
> in the situation.  Given the real constraints in the devices involved,
> they can be manufactured with every available feature of the protocol,
> nor can we assume that we can turn them all on at the same time, and
> create as much state (==memory) as we want.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
>
>