IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] WG call to adopt draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Thu, 21 February 2013 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD4C221F8984 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:32:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.543
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.543 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8mc1yvcq1kaA for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:32:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com [209.85.220.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A3121F88EF for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:32:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id fa11so2156pad.9 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:32:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lhq2SqMNhgj0++GGAq8yO7aq7+a2Dpl8Mfp3n4ACmOc=; b=nqkjEi+J1nBSXfiGtFfBO0fv4Qd5uLxY9bhjg+NQAsu38KHj/kv3te8PuYgEjXKFfI gsSYNTkDnmG71dRPoRUWn9SxorQ84BakV80TUk0vj7/e5YoOokNGAfZE3K8pQ/6eZeb4 cSPC7sEin/B80cIYm23j2kjk0XJ3ND/rFv+V0/dG4aDaacbCKwBoD4rTopW4s6lx+Qc8 LV3w8ekUmhqlXXEasdW1+LnLKngyPPD6rSotwQGSzJvNPF0tX42sk2yXEpLrh3SJ577x 0rW0b/3PX2sifPMxz6iNG3aN1t1bldIqY/FarFLpMmOTZ927eS20tfX2GymOhfGCnpNl RgaA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.143.40 with SMTP id sb8mr10015450pbb.202.1361475126991; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:32:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.33.132 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:32:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2696EF02-C90C-484C-854D-D860E5B92627@gmail.com>
References: <16172.1361386696@sandelman.ca> <CADnDZ889JxVJm8YVPisnd4=a48-Ceqe-JpsYcy8q74GLdfFNWg@mail.gmail.com> <03F31C213F2C6941BFDDBB4336E9E6CD0AD4045B@cph-ex1> <29348.1361461221@sandelman.ca> <2696EF02-C90C-484C-854D-D860E5B92627@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:32:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ888B15UD9Y6ahkfS-Q=KK8y-uY_AJyowbT-ZP4LwYZ73Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] WG call to adopt draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:32:07 -0000

On 2/21/13, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:40 AM 2/21/13, Michael Richardson
> <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
> How so?
>

The P2P-RPL is route discovery, the I-D already mentions that it is an
extension of RPL, so the P2P-RPL core routing function is similar to
RPL,

I agree that the both protocols are not very similar in performance,
but in this applicability draft I think both can be used in similar
ways, or users may use them in similar ways. The draft can advise
where is the need for different way of use.

AB

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email