IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] WG call to adopt draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 21 February 2013 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3C021F8F41 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:44:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iS-q2hnewEdK for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5199821F8F14 for <roll@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9D82016D; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:51:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 7FFC86387F; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:43:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF266387D; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:43:40 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: roll@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CADnDZ891sEYce1GPQqHk_ufva=JN2uX7h0WN+Q9_HZCSN01Kvw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <26596.1361470574@sandelman.ca> <CD4BA525.1E3E5%d.sturek@att.net> <CADnDZ891sEYce1GPQqHk_ufva=JN2uX7h0WN+Q9_HZCSN01Kvw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:43:40 -0500
Message-ID: <21952.1361479420@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Roll] WG call to adopt draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:44:50 -0000

>>>>> "Abdussalam" == Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> writes:
    Abdussalam> IMHO, I don't think the draft is about interoperability,
    Abdussalam> nor commercial issues. The draft is an applicability
    Abdussalam> draft, it helps users to use the protocol in such
    Abdussalam> environment or applications,

If there is anything in the document which is not essential for
interoperability then it can be removed from the document.

RFC6550 and friends (including the 6lowpan and 6man things) have given
us palette of options.  The purpose of this document is how to apply 
those options to a specific situation.  This document *MUST* explain
what options *MUST* be present in a device in order to interoperate 
in the situation.  Given the real constraints in the devices involved,
they can be manufactured with every available feature of the protocol,
nor can we assume that we can turn them all on at the same time, and
create as much state (==memory) as we want.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works 
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email