IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] WG call to adopt draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 22 February 2013 14:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B0F21F8472 for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:03:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QW5cd-EW6zOB for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7BF21F8473 for <roll@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A202016D; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:10:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 760B06387F; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:02:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD3A63765; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:02:35 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1528685551.439964.1361498512224.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
References: <1528685551.439964.1361498512224.JavaMail.root@mail17.pantherlink.uwm.edu>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.3; nmh 1.3-dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 22)
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:02:35 -0500
Message-ID: <21127.1361541755@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: roll@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Roll] WG call to adopt draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:03:45 -0000

>>>>> "Mukul" == Mukul Goyal <mukul@uwm.edu> writes:
    Mukul> But, P2P-RPL allows elision of the prefix. So, why can't a
    Mukul> router (in a home LLN) participate in P2P-RPL using just link
    Mukul> identifier as the address? Why does it need to know the
    Mukul> prefix if it is understood that there is only one prefix and
    Mukul> that prefix can be elided?

Perhaps I don't understand this part.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works 
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email