Re: [Roll] WG call to adopt draft-brandt-roll-rpl-applicability-home-building-03

[Abdussalam Baryun <[e-mail]>]

I ment not to include the interoperability among different
implemetation of the protocol in the draft proposed.

If I misunderstood please advise,

AB

>
> On 2/21/13, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> "Abdussalam" == Abdussalam Baryun <[e-mail]>
>>>>>>> writes:
>>     Abdussalam> IMHO, I don't think the draft is about interoperability,
>>     Abdussalam> nor commercial issues. The draft is an applicability
>>     Abdussalam> draft, it helps users to use the protocol in such
>>     Abdussalam> environment or applications,
>>
>> If there is anything in the document which is not essential for
>> interoperability then it can be removed from the document.
>>
>> RFC6550 and friends (including the 6lowpan and 6man things) have given
>> us palette of options.  The purpose of this document is how to apply
>> those options to a specific situation.  This document *MUST* explain
>> what options *MUST* be present in a device in order to interoperate
>> in the situation.  Given the real constraints in the devices involved,
>> they can be manufactured with every available feature of the protocol,
>> nor can we assume that we can turn them all on at the same time, and
>> create as much state (==memory) as we want.
>>
>> --
>> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>, Sandelman Software Works
>> IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/
>>
>>
>