IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Roll] WGLC - Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-05

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 17 September 2013 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: roll@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE9511E841A for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JBUuZEOMDAIm for <roll@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A0611E8400 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251AB20188 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:35:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 4F70163B18; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:26:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0CA636C7 for <roll@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:26:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <5238200F.1030109@gridmerge.com>
References: <CABOxzu2H3okQF=ivauG7NfkhF2RDPeyskDaa-MnTUuS6zCUCXQ@mail.gmail.com> <CE58AC02.23779%d.sturek@att.net> <CABOxzu1BLtfkWS7Ya1MQ5bLgpqebXhaDtrRY39OYy53EBcw9cQ@mail.gmail.com> <5238200F.1030109@gridmerge.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:26:53 -0400
Message-ID: <8322.1379420813@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Subject: Re: [Roll] WGLC - Working Group Last Call - draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-05
X-BeenThere: roll@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll@ietf.org>
List-Id: Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks <roll.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/roll>
List-Post: <mailto:roll@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/roll>, <mailto:roll-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 12:27:08 -0000

Robert Cragie <robert.cragie@gridmerge.com> wrote:
    > On (2):

    > I agree that all nodes in a MPL Domain MUST agree on a common value. I
    > don't think any recommended values should be given and it depends on
    > the applicability.

What is the affect on the network if there is a mis-configuration?

Can it be detected?  Does the network melt-down?

Or is it just a question of multicast not working very well (not reaching all
nodes it should)
I think that these questions will get asked by reviewers.

    > In a nutshell - I think draft-ietf-roll-trickle-mcast-05 is good to go.

Thanks.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
IETF ROLL WG co-chair.    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email