IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] draft-narten-radir-problem-statement-05.txt

HeinerHummel@aol.com Mon, 01 March 2010 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <HeinerHummel@aol.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D64B3A887B for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:36:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WDjxMnu5ZUEL for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:36:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr-da06.mx.aol.com (imr-da06.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.203]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8286A3A8BDB for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:36:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imo-da03.mx.aol.com (imo-da03.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.201]) by imr-da06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o21NaUD3022745; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:36:31 -0500
Received: from HeinerHummel@aol.com by imo-da03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id o.cec.7457ca84 (45076); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 18:36:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from magic-m23.mail.aol.com (magic-m23.mail.aol.com [172.20.22.196]) by cia-mc02.mx.aol.com (v127_r1.2) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMC028-b0144b8c4f7c1a6; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:36:28 -0500
From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Message-ID: <33862.7f03aa13.38bda97c@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:36:28 -0500
To: brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com, jmh@joelhalpern.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_33862.7f03aa13.38bda97c_boundary"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5021
X-AOL-ORIG-IP: 95.91.134.11
X-AOL-IP: 172.20.22.196
X-AOL-SENDER: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Cc: narten@us.ibm.com, rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] draft-narten-radir-problem-statement-05.txt
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 23:36:42 -0000

 
In einer eMail vom 25.02.2010 22:23:17 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com:

My  conclusion is that we can hope for 1 million routes but
should have a  solution for 10 million. I don't think there is
anything in the data or  technology that tells us we will
need a solution for 100 million or  more.



Statement:  Neither LISP nor any of all the other submitted  solutions do 
reduce the number of routes
- not even by the number 1.
 
I would appreciate either being confirmed or being taught that this is not  
correct.
 
Heiner

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email