IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG

Mattia Rossi <mattia.rossi.mailinglists@gmail.com> Wed, 20 November 2013 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mattia.rossi.mailinglists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BCE1ADBD1 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:31:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yyOKE9pLrRYP for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863C51AD8EE for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:31:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c11so2839078lbj.33 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:31:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b+L9N/epMRhOvHMYzXvU86SRTwzpSiMJAimwFm/cLZE=; b=O14dDT8sj00TvtnFrhjhzGf1mU934/MuyVCP6jYVzbtlv0eAYDFoQv+bl3ffoCmD1l 6nHUwZmTZdxm/dfunZGJNFtxlmlELUTzY0SwlQgoZjDOZoQ5M2HQy71/Kg/kj5ET0bKU AW2ji03nSTYpSj2sH+hrjhj7vJ8r1rDfa7+2QNo08aJIdsCjOmzqpPUUNv9O/iFgT0Nc +uoQ4opCilQjIYyNR01ij1oaJ3uo9vycDgdiESjzZTztCJuBiyVbcsgk0HYGDfZZ9VR9 yzasOrYfVVjTqHXCD8zOv1UG1gZXyz+AFD5QImFf7t0dHRB3l4sZOgKLZUCNuq7MhMQ4 5NYg==
X-Received: by 10.152.3.226 with SMTP id f2mr6277laf.62.1384943490188; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:31:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.108] (vpn.static.83-173-212-209.cybernet.ch. [83.173.212.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c10sm15902407lbd.9.2013.11.20.02.31.29 for <rrg@irtf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Nov 2013 02:31:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <528C8F80.10906@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 11:31:28 +0100
From: Mattia Rossi <mattia.rossi.mailinglists@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rrg@irtf.org
References: <20131119135800.82F7518C126@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <62E077F0-FEAE-4CC1-BFF9-07D2F409340D@tony.li> <2F3EBB88EC3A454AAB08915FBF0B8C7E02EEBB2F@eusaamb109.ericsson.se> <4D0FD559-1207-4138-9C2B-4FC44D23FDCC@tony.li> <CA+b+ERmUuWZz7yjxRWLpcAtb1kcb+bCO7=Cjbf8ow3aAsb3p5g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERmUuWZz7yjxRWLpcAtb1kcb+bCO7=Cjbf8ow3aAsb3p5g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 10:31:39 -0000

Am 20.11.2013 10:31, schrieb Robert Raszuk:
>> Can we please stick to _routing_ topics?
>>
>> Tony
> Reading RRG charter it is not clear to me if this group is tasked to
> improve IP routing (IP reachability protocols and architecture) or is
> open to come up and design other "routing" paradigms ... for example
> application routing ?
>
> Tony - can you clarify ?
>

I'd imagine both?
I could think that something like service based routing (which is 
application based routing) might come out of this group. You'd need to 
understand or investigate how to integrate application based routing 
with the current routing system, how to make transitions from one to the 
other, whether it's possible to use only one without the other etc.
So in my opinion we should look at everything that gets routed outside 
of a corporate or home network. In order to make new things work you 
have to understand the old stuff, and most likely improve it.

Cheers,

Mat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email