Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG

Scott Brim <> Tue, 04 February 2014 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B233A1A013B for <>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:15:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pd3PvyOli3Td for <>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:15:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453A21A0127 for <>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:15:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id wo20so9981862obc.38 for <>; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:15:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ChzeobmrF+5x1CkJdVWOOoZ6OiPle3NtWXJYzM1s0UM=; b=tr63lfFWX5unyt7pv8t1N6GnneyLN4YZWeNTFQJVK6+eJHUShBbL5kldKt67Lak9Zk baYZVerQ2iW5mY2Qf5m6IFhwn4p7r/tMLjDBx9dmT7VFpvO3h5u56HdAIp5LLIQ7ifKy XPkFgfvmd/7DFz6yTSYzP9Ousci4X2vRhBsayYtiliYalTqbEbHK1I4TkghRLb995MSD CVCDuLzqjozP+5BncLoXz7VbvLrl/RpRnRJXPbYnysWwyzoUIBc9poSUl/NXDmu2bfWj orRld7HhADQjYXsAAMQdPiQ0xIHfHt2QvkAX8EJ5rRZ1bFeTaZoejDkVhmqTZeKuMu+Z sy9w==
X-Received: by with SMTP id yw8mr2998774oeb.71.1391541313693; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 11:15:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 11:14:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
From: Scott Brim <>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:14:53 -0500
Message-ID: <>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: IRTF Routing RG <>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:15:18 -0000

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Eggert, Lars <> wrote:
> What we don't seem to have is a core group of RRG participants with the energy of reaching out to and bringing the research that is out there into the group, on a continuous basis. Those of you who feel that the group should stay around, please realize that you need to dedicate some of your own time towards making that happen.

I see it as a problem of utility. Researchers already have at least
one well-respected way to convene. Why would any researcher want to
push an idea through the RRG as it is now? The last time we rebooted,
it was specifically for "architectural alternatives, including, but
not limited to, separating host location and identification
information". There was a unifying mission, a plan, an end goal, all
related to IETF efforts.

RGs are often successful through being complementary to what is going
on in the IETF. I propose that we have an exploratory f2f meeting with
the goal of coming up with one or two missions at that level, truly
relevant to the IETF. We announce it widely in the routing area.
Presentations and papers would not be required but they would be
welcome. If none are offered, we meet anyway.