Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
heinerhummel@aol.com Wed, 05 February 2014 08:08 UTC
Return-Path: <heinerhummel@aol.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB381A00AD for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 00:08:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CC7gAJ9RGmHe for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 00:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omr-d07.mx.aol.com (omr-d07.mx.aol.com [205.188.109.204]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58E81A009E for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 00:07:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtaomg-mae01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mae01.mx.aol.com [172.26.254.143]) by omr-d07.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 21D59700000B3; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 03:07:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from core-dqc003c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dqc003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.161.137]) by mtaomg-mae01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id C6C3838000081; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 03:07:57 -0500 (EST)
To: surfer@mauigateway.com, rrg@irtf.org
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
X-MB-Message-Type: User
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: heinerhummel@aol.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D0F0608343AC0E_B50_1D4A6_webmail-m280.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 38331-STANDARD
Received: from 178.26.195.50 by webmail-m280.sysops.aol.com (64.12.145.234) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 05 Feb 2014 03:07:56 -0500
Message-Id: <8D0F06082D16A0E-B50-77E0@webmail-m280.sysops.aol.com>
X-Originating-IP: [178.26.195.50]
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 03:07:57 -0500
x-aol-global-disposition: G
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1391587677; bh=5PKA90TkfXRdTKs3AbYj/iTVyN4VVVpKbjCq+nO1TTA=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=n1rBmElE7dpoOItAFJV2YNWEemS+ieVSHe6EBSgSzz+yG2k+NGtGwWZB877n1LmMC +hvn5By6esg0yN7+PwTVpzx42AlFapNKGetEKw5aO52b4tVEv/GdhHZeFzg9pFhliW 0NpImFdvqK2vFWPZu3ylVVxa6vivstK9i3aaSbvA=
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afe8f52f1f15d6d84
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 08:08:00 -0000
The user should be made aware that his equipment is about to send out data. I have no problems if this were done in either case (national or international destination). Look, a government is suit for not protecting its people for being spied out. This means there is a strong interest for such protection but this also means, a state has to be empowered to effectively prevent what it is accused for. This is not balkanization. People have created states/nations themselves for good reason. The existing permanent data fraud must not last forever. Or do you think this is a special form of "freedom/liberty" ? Heiner -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com> An: heinerhummel <heinerhummel@aol.com> Verschickt: Mi, 5 Feb 2014 2:52 am Betreff: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Wouldn't this lead to balkinization of the internet? scott --- heinerhummel@aol.com wrote: From: heinerhummel@aol.com With the current routing architecture and its complete absence of any WHERE-awareness there is no way to give back any country its sovereignty. With TARA that wouldn't be a problem: Each country would recognize "its" part of the internet (intra- and inter-domain portions alike) and could take action that within its borders packets were encrypted according to its own keys. Packets which are being sent to outside of the country would be recognized as such ones and the user might be questioned to confirm whether forwarding should be done or not - just like he is reminded to add a subject line if missing.
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Scott Brim
- [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Alia Atlas
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Jeff Doyle
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Russ White
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Russ White
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Javier Bustos Jiménez
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Christian Esteve Rothenberg
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Naveen Lakshman
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Dmitri Krioukov
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Jakob Heitz
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Fleischman, Eric
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Robert Raszuk
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Mattia Rossi
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG hbluo
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Stephen D. Strowes
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG 丹 吴
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG hbluo
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Street, Dow
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Patrick Frejborg
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Benno Overeinder
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Maaz Rehan
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Pedro Martinez-Julia
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Wassim Haddad
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Patrick Frejborg
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Stephen D. Strowes
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Osterweil, Eric
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Matthias Wübbeling
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Sampo Syreeni
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Eggert, Lars
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Michael Menth
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG Christian Huitema
- Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG heinerhummel