Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04

If I implement my own WebRTC stack in a smartphone app, am I disallowed to
do ICE-lite in my side??

Let's focus. We can mandate constrains just into browsers so IMHO "WebRTC
browser" is the appropriate name here.

--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>
El 03/10/2013 16:26, "Tim Panton" <tim@phonefromhere.com> escribió:

> I'm starting to think that we need a less clumsy name for the webRTC media
> wire protocol
> ICE/STUN/TURN/SRTP/DTLS/RTCP/Opus/VP8/ etc...
>
> It looks likely to take on a life of it's own outside the browser.
>
> T.
>
> On 3 Oct 2013, at 15:10, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
> Hi,****
> ** **
> Just to be clear, with “WebRTC endpoint” I guess you do not include
> gateways?****
> ** **
> Maybe we should talk about “JSEP endpoints”, or something..****
> ** **
> Regards,****
> ** **
> Christer****
> ** **
> *From:* rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Justin Uberti
> *Sent:* 1. lokakuuta 2013 1:30
> *To:* Iñaki Baz Castillo
> *Cc:* rtcweb@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04****
> ** **
> Yes. In the offers and answers that WebRTC endpoints create, a=ice-lite is
> prohibited, since WebRTC endpoints must support "Full" ICE. ****
> ** **
> The remote endpoint may of course support only ICE Lite, and WebRTC
> implementations must work properly with such endpoints.****
> ** **
> This isn't normatively indicated anywhere that I could find, so I plan to
> add specifics on this to the next version of JSEP.****
> ** **
> ** **
>
> ** **
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> wrote:
> ****
> 2013/9/30 Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich) <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>:*
> ***
>
> > JSEP-04 prohibits the use of a=ice-lite. It is stated that it is
> incompatible with I-D.ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage.
> > Can you point out which specific aspect of this draft ICE Lite is
> incompatible with?
> >
> > In deployments where one endpoint is a browser and another one is a
> gateway connected to the public Internet, it makes sense to allow ICE lite.
> ****
> Without reading JSEP-04 I expect that it is not allowed for a web
> browser to indicate "a=ice-lite", but a server can do that. Anyhow,
> AFAIR the usage of ICE lite is fully transparent for the non ICE lite
> endpoint.
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <ibc@aliax.net>****
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb****
> ** **
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>
>