[rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04

"Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com> Mon, 30 September 2013 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DF021F9C8B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pe7o-GAKYR73 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4571F21F88FB for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:28:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net ( with ESMTP id r8UFSKI2013903 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:28:20 +0200
Received: from DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net ([]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ( with ESMTP id r8UFSKB9004616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:28:20 +0200
Received: from DEMUHTC016.nsn-intra.net ( by DEMUHTC001.nsn-intra.net ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:28:19 +0200
Received: from DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net ([]) by DEMUHTC016.nsn-intra.net ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:28:19 +0200
From: "Rauschenbach, Uwe (NSN - DE/Munich)" <uwe.rauschenbach@nsn.com>
To: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04
Thread-Index: Ac698bCDm/FvoM3PQXG8Sb8kVVaqug==
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:28:18 +0000
Message-ID: <56C2F665D49E0341B9DF5938005ACDF811144C@DEMUMBX005.nsn-intra.net>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 409
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1380554900-00004A43-DB7A91F8/0-0/0-0
Subject: [rtcweb] No a=ice-lite in JSEP-04
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 15:28:27 -0000

Hi Justin, Cullen,

JSEP-04 prohibits the use of a=ice-lite. It is stated that it is incompatible with I-D.ietf-rtcweb-rtp-usage.
Can you point out which specific aspect of this draft ICE Lite is incompatible with?

In deployments where one endpoint is a browser and another one is a gateway connected to the public Internet, it makes sense to allow ICE lite.

Kind regards,