Re: [rtcweb] draft-sipdoc-rtcweb-open-wire-protocol-00 (Open In-The-Wire Protocol for RTC-Web)

[Iñaki Baz Castillo <[e-mail]>]

2011/10/27 Tim Panton <[e-mail]>:
> Thank you for writing this up - before I had to ;-)
> I agree with almost all of it, but I wonder if you could add a derived requirement:
> "  4.  It MUST be possible for a website developer to make his RTC-Web
>       scenario to interoperate with a pure SIP or XMPP/Jingle network
>       without requiring a signaling protocol gateway (by using SIP over
>       WebSocket [I-D.ibc-rtcweb-sip-websocket] or XMPP over WebSocket
>       [I-D.moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket]).
>  5. It must be possible for a website developer to make his RTC-Web
>       scenario to interoperate without adding new infrastructure unless they wish to
>       interop with the wider world - i.e. if the
>       mysite.com example wished to operate as an 'island' they
>       would not need to add additional telephony or expertise
>       servers, as all the neccessary server side work could be done in php
>       by his existing web programmers.  "
>
> I think this is implied by your document, but I feel it is critically important
> so worth explicitly stating it.

Good point. IMHO it's not needed (I hope) to update the draft as I
think we all agree on the conclusions in it (including your new point
5). If not, I'll add it in a new revision.


Thanks a lot.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[e-mail]>