IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Some misunderstandings about <Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver>

"Ravindran Parthasarathi" <pravindran@sonusnet.com> Thu, 25 August 2011 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F201321F8B83 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.484
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.484 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.115, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id roVK2hQxNGmL for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ma01.sonusnet.com (sonussf2.sonusnet.com [208.45.178.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F7C21F8B7D for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonusmail06.sonusnet.com (sonusmail06.sonusnet.com [10.128.32.156]) by sonuspps2.sonusnet.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7PI89kH002824; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:08:09 -0400
Received: from sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com ([10.70.51.30]) by sonusmail06.sonusnet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:07:40 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:37:36 +0530
Message-ID: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF5106436F@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM_kxqci51=BnUFe-67Qs4eCxtGY50HDsRPrLjYULnBZJoH0Ow@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Some misunderstandings about <Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver>
Thread-Index: AcxicJ/pXJd9+LLNQ4yublCf5hHHDwA36y6g
References: <CAM_kxqci51=BnUFe-67Qs4eCxtGY50HDsRPrLjYULnBZJoH0Ow@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
To: Nguyen Duong Tuan <hoang.su.tk@gmail.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Aug 2011 18:07:40.0919 (UTC) FILETIME=[E13BB870:01CC6351]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Some misunderstandings about <Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver>
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:06:30 -0000

Hi TuanND,

<snip>
b) Browser application interacts with VoIP server (use HTTP)
        browser<------>RTCweb server & SIP client (new GW)<------>SIP
server

New Gateway is outside the scope of RTCWeb and IETF which provides the
opportunity for innovative way of building gateways but may leads to
interop issue due to mapping between RTCWebserver & SIP client w.r.t
mid-call services.
</snip>

The issue in case webserver acts as new RTCWEB & SIP GW for VoIP
communication, there is a need of protocol mapping between the protocol
used between browser & RTCWebserver (say RTCweb protocol) to SIP. In my
experience with signaling protocol interworking, the interop between two
vendors fails lot of times in mid-call services like Hold, resume,
transfer and IETF BLISS WG is good example for such failures. My
question was why RTCWeb was looking into that approach. 

>From http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg00730.html
mail thread, I understand that more discussion will occur in RTCWeb to
clarify this doubt. Please let me know in case you need more
explanation.

Thanks
Partha

PS: I have changed my company recently

>-----Original Message-----
>From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
Behalf
>Of Nguyen Duong Tuan
>Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 7:40 AM
>To: rtcweb@ietf.org
>Subject: [rtcweb] Some misunderstandings about <Usecase & architecture:
>Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver>
>
>Hello everyone,
>
>I read about Partha's question at RTCWeb mailing list at
>http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg00563.html
>
>He said that there's interoprating issues due to mapping between
>RTCWebserver and SIP client w.r.t mid-call services in the
>introduction of new gateway. Could anyone please explain more about
>those issues? I have a little bit difficult to understand his
>meanings.
>
>I couldn't send an email to Partha directly by partr@cisco.com, so I
>decided to send to this email. Sorry for any inconvenience.
>
>Thanks,
>TuanND
>_______________________________________________
>rtcweb mailing list
>rtcweb@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email