Re: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail

"Ravindran Parthasarathi" <pravindran@sonusnet.com> Mon, 22 August 2011 06:41 UTC

Return-Path: <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F95F21F87C2 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2bPaeZxbJyBk for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ma01.sonusnet.com (sonussf2.sonusnet.com [208.45.178.27]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A189621F8779 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Aug 2011 23:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonusmail05.sonusnet.com (sonusmail05.sonusnet.com [10.128.32.155]) by sonuspps2.sonusnet.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p7M6gvS8006921; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 02:42:57 -0400
Received: from sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com ([10.70.51.30]) by sonusmail05.sonusnet.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 02:42:30 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:12:25 +0530
Message-ID: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51064106@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA0B00FDABAD@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
Thread-Index: AcxSt/LlJmDEj2CnTU+w+vCeEkemKwLhqs7gAAVmnc0AAi5qgAADou9iAAG1oJAAA27vJwAEvE9wAIBeBiAAAIKf0A==
References: <BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F16D@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se><4E3AB4D4.4070308@jesup.org>, <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA09BDB6A238@MCHP058A.global-ad.net><BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F242@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se>, <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA09BDB6A34F@MCHP058A.global-ad.net><BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F245@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se>, <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA09BDB6A397@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F24A@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510640D0@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA0B00FDABAD@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
From: Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
To: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>, Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org, public-webrtc@w3.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2011 06:42:30.0094 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA0866E0:01CC6096]
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 06:41:30 -0000

John,

I agree with you. JavaScript API should have the provision to pass the metadata.

Thanks
Partha

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Elwell, John [mailto:john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com]
>Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 11:59 AM
>To: Ravindran Parthasarathi; Stefan Håkansson LK; rtcweb@ietf.org;
>public-webrtc@w3.org
>Subject: RE: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
>
>Partha,
>
>You are talking here about the metadata, I think. I assume the web page
>/ JavaScript has to deal with that - not the browser.
>
>John
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ravindran Parthasarathi [mailto:pravindran@sonusnet.com]
>> Sent: 19 August 2011 18:19
>> To: Stefan Håkansson LK; Elwell, John; rtcweb@ietf.org;
>> public-webrtc@w3.org
>> Subject: RE: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
>>
>> Stefan,
>>
>> In case recording similar to SIPREC, it is little bit more
>> than spanning two media (RTP stream) alone because recording
>> has to include some context data about recording apart from
>> the media stream.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Partha
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> > Behalf Of Stefan Håkansson LK
>> > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 8:26 PM
>> > To: Elwell, John; rtcweb@ietf.org; public-webrtc@w3.org
>> > Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
>> >
>> > >However, I did suggest (in other text in my previous
>> message) that one
>> > possible solution might be to record locally and use a
>> second RTC-Web
>> > session to transmit from the local file to the >remote
>> recorder. What I
>> > failed to say was that in this case the local file would be
>> a temporary
>> > repository - just a buffer between the two sessions.
>> > This makes sense. Also, if you look at the API proposals
>> available, it
>> > would be quite easy to forward (in real time) a stream
>> being received
>> > to another entity. There is no explicit recording, a stream being
>> > received (via RTP) is just streamed to another entity (via
>> a separate
>> > RTC-Web session). I think this would solve this case.
>> >
>> > Stefan
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rtcweb mailing list
>> > rtcweb@ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>